Summary
Your book is correct. The same valence (+3/+3 solvent/solute) will be most likely to have large solubility, while higher valences (+3/+4) will be more likely to have high solubility than lower valences (+3/+2).
Putting them in order as an example:
Solvent / Solute
+3 / +3 Highest Likelihood of Solubility
+3 / +4
+3 / +2 Lowest Likelihood of Solubility
Explanation
The Hume-Rothery rules for solubility are necessary, but not sufficient, conditions for complete solid-solution solubility. That means if any of the rules are violated, complete solubility does not occur. However, even if all of the rules are met, complete solubility is not guaranteed. Mixing always occurs due to entropy, though possibly in infinitesimally small ratios.
For posterity, the rules are as follows:
- Difference of less than 15% in the ratio of the radii of the solute and the solvent, so that
$$
\left( \frac{\left|r_{solute} - r_{solvent}\right|}{r_{solvent}} \right)\leq 0.15
$$
There must be the same or similar crystal structures between the solute and solvent.
Complete solubility occurs when the solvent and solute have the same valency. A metal will be more likely to dissolve a solute of higher valency than a solute of lower valency.
The solvent and solute should have similar electronegativity. Intermetallics tend to form when the difference is large.
The specific part you are interested in is in bold.
These rules, more or less stated the same way, can be found from several sources, including The Wiki and The University of Cambridge Department of Material Science and Metallurgy. Note that the Cambridge link states the opposite of the bolded portion of rule 3. The Cambridge link is possibly incorrect, but it is difficult to tell based on the literature whether or not rule 3 is even useful.
A thorough review of the literature surrounding the rules can be found at this link. The paper is unfortunately downloadable in Word Document form, but seems to be clean. A brief summary of the relevant part is that the relative valence factor rule (rule 3), specifically the bolded part, seems to only be valid when monovalent Cu, Ag, and Au are alloyed with B-subgroup elements of higher valence (using the Old IUPAC nomenclature, so the right-hand-block of the periodic table). The explanation involves Fermi surface and Brillouin zone interactions in the B-subgroup elements. What I take away from the review is that this particular part of rule 3 is not terribly useful in practice.