I asked this question before in the Physics Stack Exchange, but it was closed because it was considered being about engineering. That is why I am asking it here.
I am planning to install some solar panels on a flat floor. They must be inclined to optimizing the solar incidence and facilitates the cleaning of dust by the rain. In the fig (a) the wind pressure requires a strong attachment to the ground. My case is like fig (b): there is a wall that avoids that pressure.
But some people raises the Bernoulli argument: the wind above the panels lowers the pressure above, and there is an upward pressure anyway. For a wind velocity of $30 m/s$, and density of air of $1 kg/m^2$, $\frac{1}{2}\rho v^2 = \Delta p = 450 N/m^2$, what is four times the weight of the same area of the panel.
But I think that the Bernoulli principle is based only on energy conservation. Here, the energy of the air above the panel has nothing to do with the air below it, and there is no reason to expect lower pressure as a kind of compensation for higher kinetic energy.
Should I be confident that the wind is not relevant in this case, and the relevant forces on the panels are only their own weights and the Normal?