In my country are sold gas with different octane number (RON: Research Octane Number): 88, 90, 92, 95, 97, 98, and the latest is 100. RON-88 is still sold since still many old cars, motor bike, and agriculture machines which are using low spec gas. RON-90 is intended for transition, as alternative in case customer want to move forward using better gas but not so expensive. In our country, the higher RON, the more expensive.

As we know, every engine is designed with a specific compression ratio, and that RON is very related to the compression ratio. But many times I read explanation from automotive services claiming that higher RON will be better for car. Not specifically explained which car and what kind of car. Indeed we know that most cars are now having compression ratio 10:1, which according to the petrol producer that kind of is car suitable using petrol with RON 92-95. In my understanding, the compression ratio is related to the Top Dead Center (TDC), which it will produce specific compression that will compress the petrol inside ignition chamber, so it will increase temperature just before ignited by the spark. That compression made engine got hotter. If an engine with specific compression ratio is fed with petrol with RON-88, the petrol will be burned before TDC. Vice versa, if that kind engine is fed with RON-100 petrol, than the petrol will NOT be completely burnt. Hence, the automotive service claim is wrong.

So my question are: 1). am I right with my understanding? 2). for that 10:1 engine, if it fed with lower or higher RON, what will be the impact to the engine?

  • $\begingroup$ It is the air-fuel mixture that is compresed and that is mostly air as liquids are not compressible, which is why you get hydraulic lock. $\endgroup$ – Solar Mike Nov 13 '18 at 4:44
  • $\begingroup$ Have you searched on here and the Motor Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Stack? If not, you should before posting. $\endgroup$ – Solar Mike Nov 13 '18 at 4:46
  • $\begingroup$ See engineering.stackexchange.com/q/12421/10902 $\endgroup$ – Solar Mike Nov 13 '18 at 4:59
  • $\begingroup$ Also mechanics.stackexchange.com/q/498/10976 $\endgroup$ – Solar Mike Nov 13 '18 at 5:02
  • $\begingroup$ I didn't see the answer from both the links. The first is talking about fuel price related to its RON. The second is talking about engine, but not discussing about the impact of "wrong" octane number to an engine. $\endgroup$ – AirCraft Lover Nov 13 '18 at 10:52

Almost all gasoline-fueled engines have ignition systems which under high speed conditions will spark the charge in the cylinder before top dead center, so as to furnish enough time for the charge to burn to completion before the exhaust valve begins opening. So the issue is not whether or not the spark plug goes off before TDC, it is whether or not the fuel will combust smoothly or explode (detonate) with sudden violence.

The octane number is a measure of how resistant the fuel is to detonation, which is very bad for an engine that is designed to run on gasoline and so must be avoided. High compression ratios strongly favor detonation, so engines with high compression ratios must use higher-octane fuel.

In engines with lower compression ratios, detonation is still possible when the engine is running hot and under a heavy load, so there is a slight advantage to using higher octane fuels in any engine. However, most engines these days have automatic systems in them called "knock detectors" that detect the onset of detonation and retard the spark timing to block detonation under those conditions- so buying higher octane fuel for an engine that does not require it is mostly a waste of money.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ So, can I say that what is claimed by the automotive service that it is better using higher RON than lower RON is correct whereas the petrol producer consistently said that every car has specific petrol requirement? $\endgroup$ – AirCraft Lover Nov 13 '18 at 10:49
  • $\begingroup$ As this question also I posted in another thread, then I got answer as every engine is design with specific CR, so the fuel must be match to the design. According to the thread, higher RON will leave slag due not all the fuel is burnt (as higher RON will required higher temperature to burn). But feed the engine with lower RON will make knocking/detonation. This explanation seems make sense as the petrol producer said the CR for every petrol they sell. $\endgroup$ – AirCraft Lover Nov 13 '18 at 11:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.