0
$\begingroup$

Suppose you have a thin (~1/4 inch) pipe full of a fluid, with one end capped off. The fluid at the other end of the pipe is held at a temperature different from the ambient environment.

  1. How does heat travel down the length of static fluid? Will natural convection occur like in those textbook double-pane window problems? Is there a minimum pipe size where heat only transfers via conduction or some kind of diffusion?

  2. How does this change if the pipe is vertical vs horizontal?

Thanks in advance, it's been challenging to find resources for static fluid inside a pipe.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Also heat will travel down the pipe material. $\endgroup$
    – Solar Mike
    Commented Oct 29 at 7:26

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

Because the pipe is horizontal, natural convection will be minimal.

The heat will be transferred primarily through the conduction.

The conduction will occur from the warmer open end to the cooler closed end, both through the water and the pipe's material.

Using Fourier's law of heat transfer:

$$ ๐‘„ =\frac{kA\Delta T}{L}$$

Where:

  • ๐‘„ is the rate of heat transfer (W).

  • ๐‘˜ is the thermal conductivity of water (W/mยทK).

  • ๐ด is the cross-sectional area of the pipe (mยฒ).

  • ฮ” ๐‘‡ is the temperature difference between the open end and the ambient environment (K).

  • ๐ฟ is the length of the pipe (m).

For water, the thermal conductivity ๐‘˜ is approximately 0.6 W/mยทK at room temperature.

This is a steady-state situation, ignoring heat loss to surroundings.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ the delta T will be the difference between the hottest point and the ambient at any specific point along the pipe, not just the open end... Also you don't need to convert to Kelvin as it is the difference. $\endgroup$
    – Solar Mike
    Commented Oct 30 at 20:15
  • $\begingroup$ @SolarMike, the equation deals with the driving engine of this heat transfer, which is the difference between the points given. It's correct. I have noted we ignore heat loss to surroundings. You are right about delta T, Kelvin, I put it as a matter of conformity with thermal conductivity, k. $\endgroup$
    – kamran
    Commented Oct 30 at 21:43
0
$\begingroup$

Intuition

The steady state can be described using conduction as Kamran suggested. But since the fluid is not flowing, the outside convection might actually play a role. Intuitively, if you know the temperature at one end of the pipe and the environment temperature is lower, you would expect the pipe temperature to get closer to the environment temperature as you get farther from the end along the pipe. And as this temperature difference is decreasing, the rate of this decrease should also be decreasing, which suggest exponential function.

Derivation

Let's consider element of the pipe with infinitesimal length $dx$ along the axis. Heat flux which enters at one section will be equal to the sum of heat flux exiting at the opposite section and an infinitesimal heat flux to the environment:

$$\dot{Q}(x) = \dot{Q}(x+dx)+d\dot{Q}_{loss}(x)$$

In another form using Fourier law: $$-\lambda\cdot A\cdot \frac{dT(x)}{dx} = -\lambda\cdot A\cdot \frac{dT(x+dx)}{dx}+\left(T(x)-T_{env}\right)\cdot \alpha\cdot C\cdot dx$$ where:

  • $\lambda$ is the equivalent axial thermal conductivity of the pipe in combination with the fluid as well (as insulation if applicable)
  • $A$ is overall section of the pipe including the fluid (and the insulation)
  • $C$ is the outside circumference of the pipe (so $C\cdot dx$ is the outer area of the element in contact with the environment)
  • $T(x)$ is the pipe surface temperature at distance $x$ from one of the ends of the pipe
  • $T_{env}$ is reference temperature of the outer environment
  • $\alpha$ is the heat transfer coefficient between the outer surface and the environment

Using a substitution $k = \frac{\alpha\cdot C}{\lambda\cdot A}$, the equation can be rewritten as: $$\frac{d^2T(x)}{dx^2}-k\cdot T(x) = -k\cdot T_{env}$$

This is a differential equation with a general solution in the form (using WolframAplha): $$T(x) = T_{env} + C_1\cdot \exp\left(\sqrt{k}\cdot x\right) - C_2\cdot \exp\left(-\sqrt{k}\cdot x\right)$$

where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are constants, which can be determined using 2 boundary conditions. In this case, these could be any 2 known temperatures along the pipe length.

Let's say we know both end temperatures $T_0=T(x=0)=150\text{ ยฐC}$ and $T_L=T(x=L)=200\text{ ยฐC}$ for the pipe with a length $L=15\text{ m}$, whose coefficient $k=3\text{ m}^{-1}$. The pipe surface temperature distribution along its length will look like this:

enter image description here

As you can see, the pipe temperature exponentially approaches the environment temperature as you get further from each of the ends.

Horizontal vs. vertical pipe

There will definitely be a difference between these 2. The vertical pipe will have higher equivalent conductivity $\lambda$ than the horizontal pipe. When there is temperature gradient in axial direction, there will most likely be some movement of the fluid, which will contribute to this equivalent conductivity. I am not sure how to calculate it, but you could also determine the required constants for the distribution experimentally.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking โ€œPost Your Answerโ€, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.