Hello! Sorry if the question seems stupid and obvious, I am new to masonry but one of the worker at a construction site that it was better to lay brick on its short edge as shown on the top , rather than use the commonly used one shown on the bottom. He further demonstrate it to me by hitting the brick with hammer in both orientation and as expected the one on the bottom breaks while the one on the top does not. I did told him that if the brick on the bottom were laid in a stack as high as the first orientation it should be as strong or even stronger. The worker gave a counter argument saying that then the top one will be economical.
It seems counter intuitive, since larger surface area usually provides greater axial strength. I did mention about stability as well since less brick contact area are more prone to stability problem in a lateral load condition. However is there any more reason of why brick are normally laid on its larger sides.
Thankyou!