6
$\begingroup$

How can I measure changes in liquid level of the order of 50 μm?

The tank is cylindrical with a radius of about 12.5 mm and a total volume of about 45 ml. The fluid is water-based. The technique needs to be optical or similar because no external body can touch the solution.

I looked at ultrasonic sensors but they don't seem to reach such high precision. Now I'm checking laser sensors as well, but it seems that they don't satisfy the required precision either.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by 90 um of liquid? Yes, I was wondering the same thing about surface tension. But I think it isn't an issue since the radius of the tank is quite large and surface tension is important only close to the walls of the tank (isn't it?). Not very fast for the time response. $\endgroup$
    – Worldsheep
    Commented Aug 10, 2015 at 15:28
  • $\begingroup$ I should have flows of about 20ul/s... In order to verify that I want to check if after about three seconds I have additional 50ul in the tank. The first idea was to measure the flow with a flowmeter but this induced two problems. The Flowmeter touches the fluid and it is quite expensive. $\endgroup$
    – Worldsheep
    Commented Aug 10, 2015 at 15:34
  • $\begingroup$ From an electronics perspective, two analog sensor types come to mind. 1. Weight measurement. Strain gauge, heavy amplification, averaging, and filtering. 2. Ultrasonic wave from top, measure time to reflection detected. Would need a very fast processor/DSP to measure millionths-of-a-second differences in delays. Perhaps a good question for electronics.stackexchange.com $\endgroup$
    – rdtsc
    Commented Aug 10, 2015 at 15:51
  • $\begingroup$ @ rdtsc: could you detail a bit more part 1, I'm not familiar with that kind of sensors, do you have any example? $\endgroup$
    – Worldsheep
    Commented Aug 10, 2015 at 16:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If parameters of the container and liquid are known, measuring the mass and temperature and deriving level from that should be considerably easier and more precise. Also, surface tension on such size scale makes the surface positively mountainous. $\endgroup$
    – SF.
    Commented Mar 8, 2017 at 12:11

4 Answers 4

Reset to default
3
$\begingroup$

If you are adding fluid at a constant rate a simple michelson interferometer seems like a possible solution. You should get a fringe every $\lambda/2$ m, so ~300 nm. As long as you can sample fast enough it is then just a case of counting the number of fringes to get the distance moved. The only difficulty I can see with this approach is low reflectance from you liquid surface, but that will be the same for any optical method and shouldn't be too much of a problem.

Ultrasound will be difficult as you need to measure time of flight to the ns level to get that sort of resolution. It may still be possible using a lot of averaging, but I would think its not worth it.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ That's interesting, do you have in mind any manufacturer who produces something like that just to get an idea of the costs?... Wouldn't an interferometer be super-motion sensitive? $\endgroup$
    – Worldsheep
    Commented Aug 11, 2015 at 7:27
  • $\begingroup$ Another difficulty will be the uniformity of the liquid surface. Precision interferometry is usually done with mirrors which are much flatter than the wavelength of the light. A static liquid surface would work, but one which is changing in height is also likely to have a fluctuating surface. $\endgroup$
    – Chris Mueller
    Commented Aug 11, 2015 at 11:54
  • $\begingroup$ Yes exactly, it sounds precise enough but very unstable. I think a non invasive flowmeter placed in the tubing connecting the tank would be an easier solution... But not sure yes $\endgroup$
    – Worldsheep
    Commented Aug 11, 2015 at 12:23
2
$\begingroup$

(340.29(m/s))/(50 μm) = 6.8058 megahertz (or 146.933498 nanoseconds if you prefer) timing that tight is hard to measure on a micro controller, and requires a lot of knowledge to do on a micro processor, but certainly not out of the realm of possibility. That makes (ultra)sonics a possibility.

Capacitive sensors are the other method for things like this, but you said "no external body can touch the solution" so if that means a metal plate (coated in plastic if you want) can't be built into the container it won't work.

All that said, if its water based what are the effects of the meniscus on your measurement?

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I believe some laser equipment does have the 20µm that you are looking for:

Displacement measurement sensors

This product for example has a 20µm precision, but it is said that the precision depends on the optical properties of the surface, so it would require a test for your solution.

OD Mini - Compact, lightweight sensor for precise measurement

Also, another set of options is to measure properties of the liquid that are proportional to the volume of the liquid (supposing that the only variable of your experiment is the height and that the liquid composition, temperature, pressure or any other variable doesn't change). In that case you could, for example, measure the liquid resistance from one side of the cylinder to the other. However this would require a custom apparatus.

Another option that falls into this category (of using properties proportional to volume) is to use absorbance, putting a light sensor at the bottom at the flask and a light source at the top (or the inverse). In this case the precision is only limited by the precision of your apparatus. However a precision measurement might require a sophisticated apparatus (I don't know how the 50µm precision translates into complexity in this case).

And, as it was already mentioned, mass is another option. Coupling a reservoir to the cylinder which can be measured by a scale. If your experiment support this modification, I believe it is the easiest option, since precision scales are available at most labs.

Hope my answer provides some inspiration and please keep us updated on the results!

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I suggest that you look at one of the follow three options.

Ultrasonic Sensor for Texas Instrument (Option 1)

To measure liquid level from the bottom of tank one could use a piezo electric ceramic transducer combined with an Analog Front End (AFE) and a micro-controller to measure the liquid level. I believe with some additional work you can achieve your object. Check the references for more details.

Fluid Level Sensing

Capacitive Fluid Level Sensors from Molex (Option 2)

They have claimed that there system is capable of measuring very small changes. Molex still have to demonstrate there product to me. Either way it is over kill for my current project. If you happen to use them please come back and leave your feedback.

enter image description here

PSoC CapSense for Liquid Level Sensing for Cypress (Option 3)

This technology from Cypress is interesting. I have this as viable option for my current project.

Please refer to the references for additional infomation.

References:

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your answer! I'll have a look later today and come back to you. About Molex, I wrote them an e-mail two days ago, but I'm still waiting for an answer. $\endgroup$
    – Worldsheep
    Commented Aug 12, 2015 at 4:48
  • $\begingroup$ Is Cypress selling that product? I can't find it on the website. $\endgroup$
    – Worldsheep
    Commented Aug 12, 2015 at 7:00
  • $\begingroup$ Both cypress and molex are assisted sales. So you might want to contact a distributor like Arrow your area. There is a fourth one, I will get that infomation later. $\endgroup$
    – Mahendra Gunawardena
    Commented Aug 12, 2015 at 10:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.