6
$\begingroup$

Pavement Design

In roadway pavement design, the (US) controlling design load is usually the Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL). This number attempts to quantify how much bending stress a given vehicle causes in the pavement. Trucks have a much higher ESAL load than cars. In this case "truck" means "semi, big rig, freight carrier" and not a family pickup truck.

Typical values are:

  • Car Axle = 0.0002 or 0.0003 ESAL
  • Legal Truck Axle = ~2 ESAL (wide range based on weight)

By this measure, a typical car or pickup truck doesn't place any appreciable stress on the road pavement.

Pavement Life

Two sections of road that are designed and built exactly the same and a certain period of time. This period of time could be 5 year, 10 years, 20 years, etc.

  1. Road driven on only by typical family or commuter vehicles. Basically only passenger vehicles (not busses) and not hauling goods or construction materials.
  2. Road with no vehicle traffic, but experiences the same weather conditions as (1). This would also include salt application in areas where that it common.

Questions

Would you be able to tell which section of pavement was driven on?

Would light weight vehicles cause so little additional damage to the pavement that it would be indistinguishable from natural weathering?

The corollary is that trucks cause all of the pavement damage.

Just to be clear, I am not concerned with visual things that you would be able to use to differentiate, e.g. oil stains, rubber marks, etc.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you be a little more specific than "typical family or commuter vehicles?" I'm guessing you would include e.g. a full-size pickup or large SUV, but this may be less obvious to readers outside the US. Also note that in some regions, the roads are not salted. $\endgroup$ – Air Mar 16 '15 at 19:35
  • $\begingroup$ @Air Clarified. I wondered about how to best use words that would be understood as globally as possible. $\endgroup$ – hazzey Mar 16 '15 at 19:40
  • $\begingroup$ How about posting vehicle and axle weights, in tons or tonnes? $\endgroup$ – dcorking Mar 17 '15 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ @dcorking I didn't think that the weight of a varied that much. I typically assume that a car is about 4,000 lbs. That is a round number and is high. $\endgroup$ – hazzey Mar 17 '15 at 15:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Subcompacts are about a ton to a ton and a half depending on region and trim. Full-size pickups and SUVs are more like three tons. That's curb weight, no load. Also ignoring motorcycles. Plenty of variance even before raising it to a large power in the ESAL calcs. We're talking several orders of magnitude difference in the end result. $\endgroup$ – Air Mar 17 '15 at 15:18
6
$\begingroup$

Yes, there would be a noticeable difference. Normal passenger cars don't really stress the road surface much. That's not so much the issue. As a analogy, you can have 100 people walk across a small plank, and it holds fine, but even 10 people on the plank at the same time will stress it to breaking.

Cars in normal operation don't much hurt a normal road surface, but the road surface will degrade on its own. Eventually a point is reached where normal cars cause significant additional damage. For example, consider a small rock that is part of the asphalt mix coming loose over time. Cars driving over it can dislodge the rock and randomly move it around until it ends up on the side of the road. Without cars, the loose rock would have stayed in place, at least a lot longer.

This small rock principle multiplies over time. A dislodged or two small rock creates a weak spot, so ordinary car traffic can accelerate more material getting dislodged at the boundary. This causes the boundary of a defect to grow more rapidly with car traffic than without.

Of course there is a flip side too. Car traffic kills plants growing in cracks. Any abandoned road, even after just one growing season, will have weeds growing in cracks. Cracks are inevitable, and so are wind-blown or bird-dropped seeds. Roots from these plants grow, dislodging road material, and trapping windblown dirt, making more soil. This causes more plants to grow, more soil to be made etc. In places with enough rain to be generally green if left alone, a road disappears under soil remarkably quickly if left alone.

So, the difference will be quite noticeable because completely different forces are at work tearing down a active road versus a abandoned one. The main state road near my house in Massachusetts was last repaved 20 years ago. It now has lots of cracks and has developed lots of potholes in the last few weeks due to the spring conditions. However, I've seen roads abandoned for only 10 years hardly look like a road anymore unless you are on top of it and see the patches of asphalt in between the significant clumps of weeds.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.