Timeline for Figuring out Geometry for Kreg 720
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2022 at 23:34 | vote | accept | bonhoffer | ||
| Jan 22, 2022 at 21:05 | answer | added | r13 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 21:02 | answer | added | Transistor | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 20:59 | answer | added | bonhoffer | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 20:52 | history | edited | bonhoffer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
complete overhaul to account for a math error
|
| Jan 22, 2022 at 20:44 | comment | added | bonhoffer | Yep -- i'll do that | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 20:38 | comment | added | Transistor | Fix your post. That's what the edit link is for. Since you have no actual answers yet you can completely rewrite it . (If there was an answer addressing the incorrect question you would have to be careful not to make the answer look stupid by changing the question too much.) | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 19:41 | comment | added | bonhoffer | Debating. Should I modify the post to fix my error, leave as is or delete the post? What helps the community the best. Glad I asked, you pointed me to what I wasn't seeing. | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 19:39 | comment | added | bonhoffer | I want to delete my post, it's embarrassing. I did a math error, and took $s_0$ - $d_0$. Ugh, if I do it correctly, I get $\theta = 57.95648317$. | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 19:36 | comment | added | bonhoffer | You do have my thinking, that I need to be able to compare those two images and show that the rise is equal to the run. Otherwise, its 57-ish not 45 :( | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 19:34 | history | edited | bonhoffer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a picture for clarity
|
| Jan 22, 2022 at 19:31 | comment | added | bonhoffer | in that image, you have $d$ and $s$ at the top. at the bottom $d = 0$, $s = 10.1 \text{mm}$ does that clear it up? I added an image of what I measured at the bottom. | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 19:15 | comment | added | NMech | In the third image (the one that you have noted $\delta d$, and $\delta s$, you can see that they are different. It is unclear --to me at least-- how exactly you obtained the two measurements you have on the table just above (measuring 10.1 for each one). It would be helpful to show how you used the calipers to do the mearurements. | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 18:36 | history | edited | bonhoffer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a picture for clarity
|
| Jan 22, 2022 at 18:28 | comment | added | bonhoffer | On the sketch above d is the vertical dimension, I just show $\Delta$ d. $s$ is the horizonal distance, I show $\Delta$ s. I'm adding a picture to show exactly what I measured. | |
| Jan 22, 2022 at 18:11 | comment | added | r13 | Can you show the "d" & "s" on your sketch? | |
| S Jan 22, 2022 at 18:02 | review | First questions | |||
| Jan 22, 2022 at 18:11 | |||||
| S Jan 22, 2022 at 18:02 | history | asked | bonhoffer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |