Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2020 at 18:20 vote accept radkins
Apr 13, 2020 at 4:50 answer added kamran timeline score: 0
Apr 12, 2020 at 23:01 comment added DrMrstheMonarch Perhaps look at how arches looked like from his time...notice that they don’t look like how you drew it, and the components...on top of that don’t forget normal and frictional forces.
Apr 12, 2020 at 22:02 comment added Transistor I haven't a clue, really. I'm an electrical engineer!
Apr 12, 2020 at 21:39 comment added radkins The one part that makes me think he still might be talking about the absolute vertical force, is in his proposed experiment, where he mentions a scale reading out a smaller number when adding weight to the system. But maybe it's just the phrasing.
Apr 12, 2020 at 21:24 comment added radkins Yeah, great point! Leonardo's claims almost always come from real-world experiments (in which there will of course be friction). I see how adding friction could transfer some of the vertical load to A1 and A2, and originally I was trying to use this to understand how the absolute vertical forces on C1 and C2 could decrease as F increases. But, now that you mention it, I agree that he must have been talking about the proportional forces relative to F. How would we quantify how much the proportional force changes with increasing F? Would we need analyze the torque induced at the ends?
Apr 12, 2020 at 20:15 comment added Transistor I think that if everything was frictionless you might be right but would it not be the case that the larger F might cause F1 and F2 to 'bite' into A1 and A2 to the extent that some of the vertical load is transferred into them? And did he mean 'the less proportion the arch transmits to the columns'?
Apr 12, 2020 at 19:28 history edited radkins
add tag
Apr 12, 2020 at 19:20 review First posts
Apr 15, 2020 at 9:40
Apr 12, 2020 at 19:15 history asked radkins CC BY-SA 4.0