I saw this question, which was too broad, and I thought of a more specific question that can hopefully be answered.
There are "normal" (visible light spectrum) cameras, infrared cameras, and UV cameras, and there are also specialized VNIR cameras that capture the visible spectrum plus some of the near-infrared range. As I understand it, the typical application of VNIR cameras use filters to shift the NIR frequencies into the visible spectrum, to be captured by red, green, and blue sensors, producing false-color images that are essentially a composite of the NIR color information and the visible.
But what if, instead of concerning ourselves with the ability to compress the range of frequencies down into the visible spectrum for the sake of human eyesight, we designed the camera with the goal of recording the widest possible range of frequencies (for example, inventing a new image format with more than 3 channels per pixel - say, R, G, B, IR-A, IR-B, IR-C, UV-A, UV-B, UV-C, designing a sensor matrix of subpixels sensitive to those channels, etc.)? Accepting that we would have to substantially improve the manufacturing of the sensor array to achieve the same resolution as an ordinary RGB matrix, let's prioritize the minimizing of chromatic aberration over maximizing detail.
How far can we extend the frequency range of a single camera? If all the light (or electromagnetic radiation) we capture still has to pass through the same aperture and lens(es) at the same time, could we get all of the infrared, visible, and UV spectra at once? Could we go further than that? What factors impose the hardest limitations on such an endeavor? If possible, please differentiate between something that's definitely, completely impossible, vs. just prohibitively expensive.