Self-support length is the maximum length of a vertical column of the material (assuming a fixed cross-section) that could suspend its own weight when supported only at the top this is an important consideration in the construction of a space elevator. While it is unlikely a strand one molecule wide to stretch from the surface of the Earth to space, it would be interesting to know what the longest self-support length a chain one molecule wide (single-chain polymers) could be.

A larger molecule gives a larger cross section, but it is also heavier. Most space elevator concepts are tapered to provide additional strength where the load is greatest.

What kind of single-chain polymers can provide the longest self-support length for a column one molecule wide, and what would that self-support length be?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ depends on how you define molecule, some pedants would classify a metal block as a single molecule $\endgroup$ – ratchet freak Feb 16 '15 at 14:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are you looking for the material that would provide the longest self-support length as well as what that length would be? $\endgroup$ – Trevor Archibald Feb 16 '15 at 15:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Building on what ratchet freak mentioned, "molecule" may or may not have a useful notion depending on the base material. For most thermoplastics and elastomers you might talk about a single polymer chain. For metals and many ceramics, the notion of molecule is unclear, and nano-metals and nano-ceramics behave very differently than in bulk! $\endgroup$ – starrise Feb 16 '15 at 16:39
  • $\begingroup$ @TrevorArchibald Yes, "the material that would provide the longest self-support length as well as what that length would be" $\endgroup$ – James Jenkins Feb 16 '15 at 16:50
  • $\begingroup$ I am not putting limits on the definition of a molecule for this question. The Wikipedia article Molecule notes that the definition is not always strict. If you believe that a supportable definition makes more sense to answer this question, included it, along with support for your definition. I am far from an expert and do not want to instil artificial boundary's. $\endgroup$ – James Jenkins Feb 16 '15 at 17:02

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.