# Rotating two shafts together - coupling rod?

Are there any established (compact and simple) solutions for turning two 5mm rods/shafts side-by-side together by driving a singe motor? The torque is about 5kg-cm. The one I'm thinking of is the coupling rod:

Are there disadvantages to this solution compared to others, e.g., gearing?

If the coupling rod is a good solution, where could I get my hands on those "tabs" where the coupling rod connects? Is the coupling rod supposed to be connected using some small shoulder bolts and nuts?

• Huh? Your first sentence makes no sense. I thought you were looking to couple shafts end-on-end, but the picture shows two shafts next to each other. Is this coupling thingy just supposed to hold the ends in place so they don't wobble? And what does the "single motor" have to do with anything. Closing this mess until a comprehensible description is forthcoming. Dec 30, 2015 at 17:24
• It's to turn two rods together by driving just one of them. That is, to transfer the energy from one to the other. The drawing is just based on the coupling rod used in steam train wheels which attach the two tabs together but fix the distance between them. Dec 30, 2015 at 17:28
• Two pulleys and a belt, or (for higher torque) two gears and a chain. Dec 30, 2015 at 22:18
• If that's what you want, then your picture is seriously misleading. What's the point of the thing in the back the two shafts come out of? The transparent plate in the middle? Then showing the linkage coming off or rectangular plates that are nicely axis-aligned gives the impression they are stationary, just like the transparent plate in the middle. What a mess! Dec 31, 2015 at 12:32

The usual solution is to use gears, possibly with a toothed belt or chain to connect them.

A single connecting rod like you show is not sufficient — there's an ambiguity when the rod is at the extreme left or right position, allowing the driven shaft to turn in either direction. A train locomotive uses two connecting rods, 90° out of phase on either end of the axles, in order to resolve the ambiguity. Whenever one of the rods is at one of its ambiguous positions, the other rod is not, and that's what makes sure the driven shaft turns in the correct direction.

This Wikipedia article talks about the various means of coupling parallel shafts with connecting rods. This picture from that article is particularly good, because you can clearly see that the counterweights on either side of the motors are 90° out of phase.

• I see. But if one of the rods is turned (by the motor), would there still be ambiguity? The ambiguity arises from horizontal force only - right? Dec 30, 2015 at 17:40
• It doesn't matter how the driving shaft is turned. The ambiguity occurs when the force on the rod switches between pushing and pulling. Dec 30, 2015 at 17:43
• Does that mean this simulation and this simulation are both invalid? Dec 30, 2015 at 17:51
• Invalid in the sense that they aren't showing a complete picture. Dec 30, 2015 at 18:03
• So in this model, is it the orange rod that resolves the ambiguity? But how does it? It seems to be connected to a piston that drives it back and forth - won't it also suffer from ambiguity when the piston is fully pulled back? Dec 30, 2015 at 18:19

This Engineering SE Question explains why a single parallel link will not work. When the link is at top dead center there is nothing keeping the wheels in time. The mechanism can switch to a lemniscate mode which will make the wheels rotate in opposite directions. To maintain a parallel mode with just links you have to use a second link 90 degrees out of phase.