0
$\begingroup$

I have the following questions:

enter image description here

Would the capacity be the area under the curve? Or can I use this formula: $q_c = \frac{k_j \times v_f}{4}$ from the greenshields model, where the capacity flow is related to the free flow speed and jam density. If so then $q_c = 6600$

The following question is : enter image description here

I am really not sure how to approach this question. AADT = Annual average daily traffic.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ So what happens if you use the formula? You need to show what you have done so far. $\endgroup$
    – Solar Mike
    Commented Aug 13, 2022 at 9:59

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This is one of those vocabulary problems. If you know what they mean, it should be a matter of applying unit conversions.

I'll make some sense of the words. And then I will do my utmost to forget it, because it's pretty useless to learn some model when you don't even know if reality fits it...

Capacity is the maximum possible veh/hr possible.

The formula you have works if the curve is linear (which we can believe from the graph).

More generally it is max(speed*density). And here's a derivation of that qc formula.

speed = 110 km/h*(1-density/(120 veh/km)).
speed = vf*(1-density/kj)
speed*density=vf*density-vf*density^2/kj
max of such a parabola occurs where derivative is 0 so:
0=vf-2*vf/kj*density
density = kj/2
speed=vf/2
max(speed*density) = qc = kj*vf/4

Or 3300 veh/hr (which is probably per direction with an implicit 2 directions based on your mention of 6600)

Next question is irksome in how useless it is. If someone knows 12% of AADT occurs... Then that person could have counted what AADT was when taking measurements to obtain that 12%.

Anyway, it mentions a 55/45 directional split, so 3300 corresponds to the 55%. Word trap is whether that's 55% split of veh/hr or veh/km. Traffic in the measurement sense (rather than "stuck in traffic" sense where it means a section that actually lacks traffic per units of time) is something per time so it is the former (veh/hr). That means the other direction contributes 3300/55*45=2700 So both dirs it's 3300+2700=6000 veh in that hr. Divide by .12 aka 12% and you get 50000.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Abel, thanks for the explanation. I really appreciate this. $6600$ is actually my typo, I meant to type $3300 $instead. So would the first question be $3300$ or $6600$? The question asks for 'What is the capacity of this section?'. Does 'section' imply both directions? $\endgroup$
    – CountDOOKU
    Commented Aug 14, 2022 at 6:01
  • $\begingroup$ That is a question that probably only the writer of the question can answer. If it were a real highway, I could go measure if I really had to. It isn't unheard of for textbooks and questions in them to be incorrect, especially if someone is going about changing numbers to require new students to purchase a new edition. All I can do is guess what someone means to say with their words. $\endgroup$
    – Abel
    Commented Aug 14, 2022 at 10:47
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps the meaning of section changes with mention of directional split, meaning the answer to Q14 remains 3300. There is no reason given after all that a density speed relation should be the same in both directions... $\endgroup$
    – Abel
    Commented Aug 14, 2022 at 11:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.