0
$\begingroup$

I am trying to compute the deflection of a hollow tube of mild steel, and my computation seems to give radically different results than a couple of online calculators. Apparently one is in error.

The tube is 1.5" nominal Schedule 40, 100" long, with a point load of 100lb at the center. The formula for maximum deflection of a simple supported beam with point load at center is P*L^/48EI. For mild steel, E = 2.9e7. The tube has 1.9" OD and 1.61" ID, which gives its area moment of inertia as 0.310 in^4. Thus the maximum deflection is 0.23".

However, both these calculators:

https://www.easycalculation.com/engineering/mechanical/deflection-round-tube-beams.php

https://www.meracalculator.com/engineering/deflection-round-tube-beams.php

give similar and much higher results of about 3.5". They appear to be using a factor of 3, instead of 48, in the denominator in the formula. This is correct for a cantilever beam with a point load at the end. But neither site suggests it's for a cantilever beam, making me wonder if there's something special about round tube beams that I do not understand.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Does either website indicate how the beam is constrained or loaded? Without those details, the website is useless. $\endgroup$
    – JohnHoltz
    Jul 24, 2022 at 17:05
  • $\begingroup$ @blacksmith37 Gonna be a vertical pipe. And 100 inches, not 100 feet. $\endgroup$ Jul 24, 2022 at 19:40
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnHoltz Good point. $\endgroup$ Jul 24, 2022 at 19:41

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Your suspicion is correct. The deflection formula was noted below the first cal page. The second should be similar.

enter image description here

Similarly, below the second calculator:

Formula

MI for Solid Round Beams = (pi * (OD^4 - ID^4))/64

Deflection = (length^3 * force)/(3 * E * MI)

Bending Stress = (force * length) * (0.5 * height)/MI

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ So they meant it to be for a cantilevered beam, even though they didn't say so ? Lame. But 3.5" deflection seem pretty obviously wrong, just intuitively. $\endgroup$ Jul 24, 2022 at 19:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Any calculator should list the formula, units, and explanation all of the parameters in the formula, otherwise, switch to other calculators that are well documented. $\endgroup$
    – r13
    Jul 24, 2022 at 19:59
  • $\begingroup$ I actually prefer my own calculator. A little spreadsheet with three sets of entries. One set is modulus of elasticity of various materials, one set is the moment of inertia of various cross-sections, and one is 4 cases (point and distributed loads for simple-supported and cantilevered). In each set, I check one entry. And I enter the length of the beam, and the load. Works for almost everything I do around the house and shop. But I like to check it against another calculator from time to time, and was disturbed when I got an order of magnitude larger deflection. $\endgroup$ Jul 24, 2022 at 22:16
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it is a wise choice. $\endgroup$
    – r13
    Jul 24, 2022 at 23:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Good note. I guess they mean the pipe wall is solid rather than perforated. $\endgroup$
    – r13
    Jul 25, 2022 at 2:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.