0
$\begingroup$

I am having a difficult time solving the following problem. The only thing we learned in class was parallel continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) with equal-sized reactors and equal flow rates for each reactor (which I think also implies the volumetric flow rate is the same across all reactors).

When the 1st order liquid-phase reaction $A \rightarrow B$ (elementary) is carried out in a single CSTR (initial concentration of species A = $C_{A0}$, reactor volume = $V_R$, volumetric flow rate = $ \nu_0 $), one can achieve 80% conversion. The same reaction is to be conducted in two CSTRs connected in parallel while keeping the total reactor volume constant at $V_R$. How should we split the volumetric flow rate when the final conversion ($X_{final}$) is 0.786. enter image description here

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Initial Case Applying a mole balance to the single CSTR in steady state yields \begin{align} v_0C_{A0} - v_0C_{A} - kC_{A}V &= 0 \\ C_{A} &= \frac{v_0C_{A0}}{v_0 + kV} \tag{1} \end{align} The conversion, combining with Eq. (1), is \begin{align} X_1 &= \frac{C_{A0} - C_A}{C_{A0}} \\ X_1 &= \frac{C_{A0} - \dfrac{v_0C_{A0}}{v_0 + kV}}{C_{A0}} \\ X_1 &= 1 - \frac{v_0}{v_0 + kV} \\ X_1 &= \frac{kV}{v_0 + kV} \rightarrow kV = \frac{X_1v_0}{1 - X_1} \tag{2} \end{align} We will use Eq. (2) later.

Second Case Now the volumetric flow rate splits in two. Let me call that value in the upper branch $ \alpha v_0 $, and the one for the lower branch $(1 - \alpha)v_0$. Since we have a bifurcation, the concentration of reactant $A$ doesn't change, so the value is still $C_{A0}$ when entering both reactors.

We denote the exit concentration in the reactor at the top $C_{A1}$, and at the bottom $C_{A2}$. Applying a mole balance to both CSTR's in steady state, with equal volumes but of value $V/2$, yields \begin{align} \alpha v_0C_{A0} - \alpha v_0 C_{A1} &- (k C_{A1})\frac{V}{2} = 0 \\ (1 - \alpha)v_0C_{A0} - (1 - \alpha)v_0C_{A2} &- (kC_{A2})\frac{V}{2} = 0 \\ C_{A1} = \frac{\alpha v_0C_{A0}}{\alpha v_0 + kV/2} &\hspace{0.25 cm} C_{A2} = \frac{(1 - \alpha)v_0C_{A0}}{(1 - \alpha)v_0 + kV/2} \tag{3,4} \\ \end{align} Now, upon mixing the streams, the volumetric flow rate recovers its value $v_0$. However, the concentration changes, and we denote its value by $C_{A3}$. This one is obtained by a mole balance at steady state, combining with Eqs. (3) and (4) \begin{align} \alpha v_0C_{A1} + (1 - \alpha)v_0C_{A2} &= v_0 C_{A3} \\ C_{A3} &= \alpha C_{A1} + (1 - \alpha)C_{A2} \\ C_{A3} &= \frac{\alpha^2 v_0C_{A0}}{\alpha v_0 + kV/2} + \frac{(1 - \alpha)^2v_0C_{A0}}{(1 - \alpha)v_0 + kV/2} \tag{5} \\ \end{align} The conversion, using Eq. (5), yields \begin{align} X_2 &= \dfrac{C_{A0} - C_{A3}}{C_{A0}} \\ X_2 &= \dfrac{C_{A0} - \dfrac{\alpha^2 v_0C_{A0}}{\alpha v_0 + kV/2} - \dfrac{(1 - \alpha)^2v_0C_{A0}}{(1 - \alpha)v_0 + kV/2}}{C_{A0}} \\ X_2 &= 1 - \frac{\alpha^2 v_0}{\alpha v_0 + kV/2} - \frac{(1 - \alpha)^2v_0C_{A0}}{(1 - \alpha)v_0 + kV/2} \tag{6} \\ \end{align} Now we combine Eq. (2) with Eq. (6) \begin{align} X_2 &= 1 - \frac{\alpha^2 v_0}{\alpha v_0 + \dfrac{X_1v_0}{2(1 - X_1)}} - \frac{(1 - \alpha)^2v_0}{(1 - \alpha)v_0 + \dfrac{X_1v_0}{2(1 - X_1)}} \\ X_2 &= 1 - \frac{\alpha^2}{\alpha + \dfrac{X_1}{2(1 - X_1)}} - \frac{(1 - \alpha)^2}{(1 - \alpha) + \dfrac{X_1}{2(1 - X_1)}} \tag{7} \\ \end{align} Eq. (7) is a non-linear equation that we need to solve. Note that if $\alpha = 1/2$, the left-hand side yields 0.8, which is reasonable.

It is informed to us that $X_2 = 0.786$ and that the original conversion was $X_1 = 0.8$. Upon solving numerically, we found actually two possible solutions $$ \boxed{\alpha \in (0.33500,0.66500)} $$ However, since both branches are "identical" to each other, it is the same if 33.5% goes up, and 66.5% goes down, or vice versa.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the answer! Looking at the problem again, I realized that my mistake was that, I didn't account for the mixing, and was drawn to solve the individual conversion for both reactors in parallel. Once again, thank you! $\endgroup$
    – ralfanino
    May 12, 2023 at 4:48
  • $\begingroup$ @ralfanino No problem. Consider upvoting or closing the answer if it was helpful haha. If you have any further question just shoot them. This are fun exercises though. $\endgroup$ May 12, 2023 at 11:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.