The other day I was looking for example drawings to follow that would be used in a real world context as opposed to basic exercise books and I stumbled across a museum archive of the V2 rocket design. Aside from it being German language the first couple of drawings I opened at random seemed to be very well aligned for what I was looking for and I have started drawing up parts in Inventor.

In the following drawing 361D I got a little confused.

enter image description here

In part 1 The vertical shaft that extends through the top does not show any signs of threading in either of the sections cuts and I would have assumed that is was a smooth 4.1 dia. drilled hole. However when I look at the Bottom/Top view? I see two concentric circles representing the hole. I thought this represented a threaded hole. Similar the 4 M4 threaded holes in the sides and the 4 M3 threaded holes in the bottom. (M4 represents a 4 mm diameter thread hole?) When I look at the assembly view and section A-B (Above) I noted that part 3 is supposed to pass through the hole in the top of part 1.

enter image description here

The portion of Part 3 (below) that passes through Part 1 appears to me as it if is a threaded 4 mm diameter shaft due to the M4 designation below it and the double lines for side walls.

enter image description here

The other shaft that is confusing me is in Part 3 and (above) as well. The threaded hole down from the top is annotated as M4 which I interpreted as a 4 mm diameter hole. According to the assembly drawing section A-B and C-D, Part 4 screws in to this portion of Part 3. Part 4 annotates the shaft as being a matching M4 thread. The confusing part for me is the bottom threaded M4 shaft in Part 3 appears to be wider than the threaded M4 hole above it. Further more the bottom/top view of part 3 seem to indicate that the top threaded hole is a match to the 2 mm dia. transverse through hole at the the bottom of the M4 hole.

Am I misinterpreting something here or are these a drawing errors?

I can't really ask the designer what the correct interpretation should be.

  • $\begingroup$ looks like the ⌀4.1 hole, in figure 1, is a (close) clearance hole for the M4 screw. The dashed-line concentric circle in the overhead view you're referring to might be a hidden line of a slight countersink (edge break), rather than a thread indication. This makes sense too, because the part in figure 5 is obviously threaded in its center hole and is acting like the nut for the M4 screw fastening the part discussed above. $\endgroup$
    – Pete W
    Commented Nov 3, 2021 at 0:30
  • $\begingroup$ the female thread in part 3 and the male thread on part 4 do look like very much like 2mm diameter, from the scale $\endgroup$
    – Pete W
    Commented Nov 3, 2021 at 0:33
  • $\begingroup$ @PeteW Thank you. I thought the same thing about a potential counter sunk head in Part 1 due to the 4.1dia. dimention not lining up with the hole sides. If that was the case though I could not figure out was the main hole diameter was supposed to be. $\endgroup$
    – Forward Ed
    Commented Nov 3, 2021 at 11:26
  • $\begingroup$ Yes it looks inconsistent in some places. The view showing assembly shows that the male thread on part 3 goes into that "4,1" hole so it must be clearance for that, unless its some self-tapping thread in a softer material, but there's no indication of that $\endgroup$
    – Pete W
    Commented Nov 3, 2021 at 23:03


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.