I am working to reduce the deflection in a cantilever/ dive board at work.$300 mm(L) \times 30mm(B) \times 2 mm(H)$, i.e. it's a rectangular cross section currently.

I can't change the material, or length.

I started playing with cross sections to reduce the deflection. So I stacked 7 semi circular beams of 4mm Dia. next to each other(thus not changing the height from rectangular beam) assuming it would increase my "I" by 7 X I of single semi circular beam, thus making it stiffer than the current beam but IT DID NOT. Any idea why?


  • I(Rectangular cross section): $bh^3/12= 20 mm^4$

  • I (single Semicircular Beam of Dia 4)= $\pi \cdot r^4/8= 6.28 mm^4$

Again, I assumed stacking up next to each other would make the total area moment of inertia(I) = $7 \cdot 6.28 = 43.96 mm^4.$

And Using Deflection = $FL^3/48EI$, I thought it would decrease my deflection by more than half.IT DIDN'T WORK. FEA results showed increase in deflection.

Any idea why? Sorry if it's a dumb question

  • $\begingroup$ Think you need diagrams as first you say in series then next to each other. Just can’t be sure of what you describe. $\endgroup$
    – Solar Mike
    Jun 12 at 18:52
  • $\begingroup$ If I understood correctly, ( and continuing from Solar Mikes's comment), Did you replace the one beam with cross-section 30mm x 2mm with 7 half circles of diameter 2mm stacked along side? $\endgroup$
    – NMech
    Jun 12 at 19:08

If I understood correctly from your post you started with the following cross-section (Lets say A)

enter image description here

and you replaced it with the following (or the inverted) (let's call it B).

enter image description here

There is one reason why you are getting larger deflections,

the total second moment of area is smaller.

Crosssection A

The total second moment of area for Cross-section A along axis X is:

$$I_{xx,A} = \frac{bh^3}{12} = 20[mm^4]$$

Crosssection B

For cross-section B, the actual moment of area is -indeed- 7 times the moment of area for the semi-circle (SC). $$I_{xx,B} =7 \cdot I_{xx, SC}$$

However, the semi-circle $I_{xx, SC}$, is given by (see wikipedia) : $$ I_{xx, SC}= 0.1098r^4$$

enter image description here

Therefore the total $I_{xx,B}=12.3 mm^4$.


According to the above you should expect approximately 60% more deflection from case B, because:

  • $I_{xx,A}=20 mm^4$
  • $I_{xx,B}=12.3 mm^4$

However that was to be expected because, if you put the two cross-section together you'd see that cross-section A encapsulates B.

enter image description here



You made two mistakes in your hand calculation:

1) Wrong equation was used to calculate the moment of inertia - you used the equation for $I_y$ instead of $I_x$, thus resulting in the hand calculation being larger than the calculation done by the FEM program ($I_y$ > $I_x$).

enter image description here

$I_x = \frac{(9\pi^2 -64)r^4}{72\pi} \approx 0.1098r^4$

$I_y = \frac{\pi r^4}{8} = 0.3927r^4$

2) Wrong equation was used for the deflection calculation.

enter image description here

The equation you have used corresponds to a simply supported beam with a concentrated load in the mid-span.

enter image description here

Thus, the FEM reported a much larger deflection than you had anticipated.

Please keep in mind, the correct/successful design of a diving board is quite involved, which shouldn't be contemplated by an amateur without being mentored, or supervised by a knowledgeable person.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.