0
$\begingroup$

Most multistory buildings have enclosed exit stairways somewhere within them to provide safe egress from their non-discharge floors. In a building that relies on hydronic heating/cooling, steam heating, or direct (resistance) electrical heating, the US model building Codes are rather clear that the heating/cooling equipment for the stair can live within the stair enclosure, in addition to having the ventilation equipment for that stair enclosure placed within the stair enclosure, connected directly to outside air.

This is as per the penetration rules in NFPA 101 7.1.3.2.1(10), which explicitly permit steam and water heating and cooling lines to serve the stairshaft in addition to electrical conduits, as well as IBC 1023.6 point 2, which permits exit stair ventilation equipment (in my case, a "single room" or "decentralized" type HRV or ERV in addition to an air handler/indoor unit) to be located within the stair enclosure. Furthermore, the IBC's definition of ventilation includes means for supplying conditioned air to the space being ventilated, which supports interpreting 1023.6 point 2 to permit the placement of an air handler dedicated to an exit enclosure within that exit enclosure.

However, it seems to me that this argument falls down as soon as you provision direct-expansion air conditioning to the exit enclosure using a traditional split-system architecture. This is due to NFPA 101 7.1.3.2.1(10) not permitting refrigerant lines to enter stairshfts, the Handbook commentary stating that 7.1.3.2.1(10) is intended to be a comprehensive list of permitted exit enclosure penetrations, and IMC 1109.2.3 prohibiting refrigerant lines from entering exit enclosures (exit passageways and exit stairs).

This, however, has the effect of forcing the air handler for the exit enclosure to be moved outside the exit enclosure, or to be migrated into a unitary system such as a through-the-wall or rooftop terminal type unit. However, through-the-wall and packaged terminal units struggle with unwanted air leaks between the unit chassis and the wall sleeve, and RTUs have efficiency issues as well due to the entire unit living outside, forcing ducts to penetrate walls into exterior space. Furthermore, there may not be adjacent indoor spaces available to house said air handler if it is desired to place it indoors. Even if such spaces are available, that requires fire dampers on the duct penetrations thru the stairshaft as well as shaft-rated construction around the ducts and the air handler itself, which makes maintenance access to said air handler much more difficult.

This leaves me wondering: is it the intent of the model Codes to prohibit exit enclosures from being served by direct-expansion air handlers (split system indoor units) located within them? It seems to me that the combination of a small ductless mini-split heat pump and a distributed-type HRV or ERV would provide an inexpensive way to fully service an exit enclosure in a fashion that's compatible with a low-load, high-efficiency building design, yet on their face, the IMC's refrigeration rules seem to apply to all split refrigeration systems, from a one-ton minisplit heat pump to a massive supermarket's remote chiller system, despite the vast difference in risk between the two. Furthermore, hydronic and steam lines can leak too; worse yet, some heating systems that are allowed, such as one-pipe steam radiators, are more prone to fluids leakage during common malfunction conditions (any sort of stuck radiator vent on a one-pipe system will cause the radiator in question to spit cruddy water on a regular basis) than modern direct-expansion split systems ever are.

$\endgroup$
17
  • $\begingroup$ I am not an HVAC guy but have two questions: 1) Isn't the heat pump requires cooling and be installed outdoor? 2) Are you talking about units on the ceiling, or on anywhere of the stairway? $\endgroup$
    – r13
    Apr 18 at 21:42
  • $\begingroup$ @r13 -- on a ceiling or a wall, and i'm referring to the indoor unit of the heatpump as obviously the outdoor unit will live outside $\endgroup$ Apr 18 at 22:21
  • $\begingroup$ I think it is prohibited to have any obstruction on the stairway, and anything, other than sprinklers, that will spill or emit dangerous substances. Are you sure your ideas have no such concerns? $\endgroup$
    – r13
    Apr 18 at 22:32
  • $\begingroup$ @r13 -- you can put a steam radiator in an exit stairwell, from what I can tell -- those things can spit a whole mess of hot water and gunk if they malfunction! $\endgroup$ Apr 18 at 22:45
  • $\begingroup$ I've seen steam pipes/boilers explosion in industrial facilities, but not in general buildings, for which the installation tends to be the low-pressure type, and meet special requirements for safety. $\endgroup$
    – r13
    Apr 18 at 23:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.