3
$\begingroup$

Does a standard formula exist for calculating the (maximal) deflection of a constrained rectangular plate that is loaded with a evenly distributed pressure?

I found this Useful tables of mechanics, however I'm not sure if it's correct:

http://www.roymech.co.uk/images/Plate_12.gif

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

deflection of a constrained rectangular plate

By this I assume you mean that all edges are fixed.

My general go-to for these types of formulations is Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain, 7th Edition. These formulations assume a flat plate with straight boundary conditions and constant thickness. Also, Poisson's ratio for the material is assumed to be $\nu = 0.3$.

From Table 11.4 of that text, Case No. 8a, Uniform load over entire plate:

$$y_{max} = \frac{\alpha q b^4}{Et^3}$$

The $\alpha$ value is found by considering the dimensions of the plate:

enter image description here
enter image description here

Note that this formula is really only strictly valid for materials with $\nu = 0.3$. If the material has a different Poisson's ratio, they may need to be adjusted. Roark's lists the following references next to this formulation that may be of some help if you have a differing $\nu$ value:

  • Timoshenko, S., and J. M. Lessells: "Applied Elasticity," Westinghouse Technical Night School Press, 1925.

  • Evans, T. H.: Tables of Moments and Deflections for a Rectangular Plate Fixed at All Edges and Carrying a Uniformly Distributed Load, ASME J. Appl. Mech., vol. 6, no. 1, March 1939.

  • Timoshenko, S., and S. Woinowsky-Krieger; "Theory of Plates and Shells," 2d ed., McGraw-Hill, 1959.

I do not have copies of these documents, so I cannot verify their utility for this problem.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ That's indeed a different formula..I'm using rubber as material (Poisson's ratio is about 0.5) should that differ a lot? $\endgroup$
    – Alexm
    Aug 19 '15 at 15:19
  • $\begingroup$ @Alexm, please see my edit. The formulation will probably be a close enough approximation for your rubber case, but you might need to do further reading. $\endgroup$
    – grfrazee
    Aug 19 '15 at 15:27
  • $\begingroup$ @Alexm, I just realized if you plug in your different $b/a$ ratios in the equation you provided, you will find the same $\alpha$ constants as tabulated by Roark $\endgroup$
    – grfrazee
    Aug 19 '15 at 16:04
  • $\begingroup$ @Alexm, Yes, a nearly incompressible material ($\nu \approx 0.5$) will differ "a lot" from results tabulated for $\nu= 0.3$. Timoshenko & Krieger referenced in the answer is one of "the bibles" and is available here archive.org/details/TheoryOfPlatesAndShells. The formulas in T&K are valid for isotropic materials with any value of $\nu$, but numerical constants are usually only tabulated for $\nu = 0.3$. $\endgroup$
    – alephzero
    Aug 19 '15 at 17:02
  • $\begingroup$ Link to the book: materiales.azc.uam.mx/gjl/Clases/MA10_I/… $\endgroup$
    – supergra
    Aug 15 '19 at 23:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.