given that handy stroboscope can also check translational vibration of parts, is it a substitute for a test that can be done by accelerometer for stationary vibrating equipment?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is pretty much a repeat of your previous question, engineering.stackexchange.com/questions/40018/…. If you don't get an answer to a question then please improve it rather than post it again. $\endgroup$ – Transistor Jan 29 at 16:29
  • $\begingroup$ No it's not a repeat, that was with focus on vibration type here the instrumentation is the focus $\endgroup$ – FabioSpaghetti Jan 29 at 18:19

No. Strobes are useful for what they can do, but they are not substitutes for accelerometers.

A strobe can give you a "picture", but it doesn't measure anything except maybe frequency. It doesn't measure amplitude, harmonic content of the vibration, etc.

Also a strobe is only useful for amplitudes which are big enough to see. Accelerometers can measure high frequency vibrations with amplitudes of micrometers or smaller.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.