0
$\begingroup$

angular momentum but it's a couple vector

In my book, Vector Mechanics for Engineers_ Statics and Dynamics, sometimes angular momentum vectors and their derivatives are noted as a couple vector. there are not a single explanation about it anywhere though. A couple vector is defined by two equal, opposite force vectors, if I'm not mistaken. So I looked up on other books like Engineering Mechanics_ Dynamics, but there is no such expression in the book. I don't know what the author of the first book I mentioned here intended to say.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ A vector has a magnitude and a direction. A couple, as in a representation of a torque, for instance, is more than just two opposite vectors representing the forces -- the distance between the lines of the forces is equally important. That distance can also be represented by a vector (e.g. one for each force, one for location of each force from some reference point). You can then use the cross product operation to combine the force-direction and force-location into yet another vector -- torque. $\endgroup$ – Pete W Jan 17 at 17:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks, you saved my day. Have a nice day. $\endgroup$ – AnAspiringMechanicalEngineer Jan 17 at 17:48
1
$\begingroup$

Although the concept of couple is more usually encountered in Forces and moments and in equivalent systems, the concept of couple can be used for the momentum.

couple in forces

More specifically, the concept of couple is the following:

enter image description here

Assume you have a system like the one in the far left of the image above. (i.e. a force F applied to point A), and you want to find an equivalent system with respect to B. Force F has a translational and a rotational effect with respect to B.

The middle and the far right systems are equivalent in terms of the translational and the rotational behaviour wrt to point B.

Essentially, the moment M in the far right is equal to translating force F to the point B. If you translate the force so that is passing through point B, then F does not produce any rotational moment. To compensate for that, you can either use the moment $M = F\cdot d$ (far left) or introduce a couple of forces (middle). In all cases the effect is the same.

Although in the example above, its very simple, this can be very useful when the aim is to sum up the effect of all forces on a body. So in the following example:

enter image description here

Instead of working with 5 forces you are only working with one force that has a translational effect, and moment which is responsible for the rotational behaviour. (You could just have the resultant force translated parallel to its axis, however you'd still need the distance. This convention of couples or moments is quite common).

Couple in angular momentum

In the case of the angular momentum, the momentum is the equivalent of force, and the angular momentum corresponds to moment. Again what you are trying to achieve, is you are trying to describe the kinetic state of the rigid body in motion. Each molecule on the rigid body might have a different velocity. The results is that you might have translational and rotational momentum. So it is convenient to use the linear momentum for the center of gravity and also calculate the angular momentum.

So, following the analogy of the force couple, the angular momentum can be a couple vector with:

  • each vector in the couple have magnitude equal to the magnitude linear momentum, and
  • the distance between the vectors is equal to the distance the linear momentum vector passes away from the center of gravity.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.