1
$\begingroup$

I am investigating fuzzy control and I am a little confused, I have come across 3 models and I can't quite fathom out what is going on.

enter image description here

In this PD+I controller, I can see the error signal being scaled by Kp and the derivative of the error being scaled by Kd and being fed into the fuzzy controller. I can the integral of the error being scaled by Ki and being fed into the summing junction along with the controller output scaled by Kh.

enter image description here

In this PID controller, I can see the error is fed into GE and GE4 which are the proportional scaling factors, Discrete Derivative Filter 1 and 2 which are the derivatives of the error which are being scaled by GCE and GCE1 respectively and are then fed into their respective fuzzy controller. This is where it becomes confusing, the output of Fuzzy logic controller 1 is scaled by GCU and then integrated which would seem to be the exact same as the PD+I controller in figure 1, it seems that controller 1 is a PID controller 2 is a PD controller?

enter image description here

Finally, this controller is the 1 that really bamboozled me, I can see the error e(t) being scaled by Ki (shouldn't this be Kp?) and the derivative being scaled by Kp (shouldn't this be Kd?) and the output from the controller is integrated with no scaling factor, apart from the absence of the scaling factor before the integral, this looks the same as the PID.

I suspect that my understanding of Fuzzy controllers are not correct so I would be very appreciative if someone could shed some light on this. Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ In the last example the integral seems to be just there due to the nature of the plant physics. Its there to correct the difference between what is being measured versus what is actually controlled. The first one is just fuzzy PD with nonfuzzy I term. $\endgroup$ – joojaa Jan 9 at 21:10
0
$\begingroup$

So I have managed to shed some light on this little conundrum so I thought I would share my findings, hopefully, it will be useful for others.

As @joojaa pointed out in the comments, the first one is, in fact, a Fuzzy PD-type controller with an additional non-Fuzzy integral, the second example is actually a Fuzzy PI+PD controller and the last example is a Fuzzy PI-type controller.

Now to clear up the confusion,

In the first example, if we remove the non-Fuzzy Integral, we have a Fuzzy PD-type controller, the error, the change of error and output have membership functions which rule base is determined with consideration to the type of controller, Kp and Kd are the proportional and derivative tuning factor respectively.

In the second example, Fuzzy logic controller 2 is clearly the same as the first example when we remove the non-Fuzzy integral, with GE4 and GCE4 being the proportional and derivative tuning factors respectively. Fuzzy logic controller 1 is the Fuzyy PI-type controller, the subtle differences are the membership function rule base will reflect the fact that this is a PI-type controller, GE and GCE are the integral and proportional tuning factors respectively which is shown in the third example, also pay attention to the output U, the PI and PD type controller is CU and U respectively, the G is just a gain scaling factor.

In the third example, this is a Fuzzy PI-type controller, the only difference in this controller to the ones above is that the output CU doesn't have a scaling factor.

To summarise, the main difference between a Fuzzy PI and PD-type controller is an integrator for PI-type controllers for the CU output, the location of the tuning factors and the way the membership function rule base is defined.

This is to the best of my knowledge.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.