# Acceleration of spool on conveyor belt

A spool has a mass of 500 kg and a giration radius of $$k_G = 1.30m$$. The spool lies on the surface of a conveyor belt, the static coefficient of friction is $$\mu_S=0.5$$. The spool is not moving at the beginning.

Determine:

• the largest acceleration $$a_T$$ of the conveyor belt, such that the spool does not slip.
• the pulling force in the rope. The equations I have are:

$$I_G = m \cdot r^2 = 500 kg \cdot (1.3 m)^2 = 845 kgm^2$$

$$\sum_i \vec{F_i} = m_G \cdot \vec{a_G}$$

$$\vec{N} + \vec{T} + \vec{F_z} + \vec{F_w} = m \cdot \vec{a_G}$$

After projection I get:

$$\begin{equation} \begin{split} T - F_w & = m_G \cdot a_G \\ N - F_z & = 0 \end{split} \end{equation}$$

For the moments I get:

$$\sum \vec{M_G} = I_G \cdot \vec{\alpha}$$

$$\begin{equation} T \cdot 0.8 - F_w \cdot 1.6 = I _G \cdot \alpha \\ \end{equation}$$

Other relations are

$$\begin{equation} \begin{split} -a_G + 1.6 \cdot \alpha & = a_T \\ a_G & = -0.8 \cdot \alpha \\ F_w & = N \cdot \mu \end{split} \end{equation}$$

The solution from the teacher is: This solution does not satisfy

$$a_G = -0.8 \cdot \alpha$$

My question is: "Is this last equation wrong?"

Point $$B$$ is the system's initial instantaneous center. So the acceleration of point $$A$$ is equal and opposite to the acceleration of $$G$$ at $$t=0$$. This is the trick to solving this problem.

There is a force couple of $$2452.5\,N$$ at slip inception with an arm of $$0.8\,m$$ to the instantaneous center $$B$$. There is some additional tension on the rope needed to provide the acceleration of mass to the right. Use parallel axis theorem to calculate $$I$$ about $$B$$.

$$\alpha = F_s* 0.8\,m)/(I_g + mass*.8\,m^2)$$ $$\alpha = (2452.5\,kgm/sec^2 * 0.8\,m)/(845\,kgm^2 + 500\,kg*.8\,m^2)$$ = $$1.684\, rad/sec^2$$ clockwise.

acceleration of $$G =\alpha* 0.8\,m$$
acceleration of $$G =1.684\,rad/sec^2 * 0.8\,m = 1.347\,m/sec^2$$ to the right.
that takes a force of $$1.347\,m/sec^2 * 500kg = 673.65\,N$$

$$F_s = 2452.5/,N$$ to the left.
$$T = 2452.5\,N + 673.65\,N = 3126.1\,N$$ to the right.

acceleration of belt = $$1.6\,m * 1.684\,rad/sec^2 - 1.347\,m/sec^2 = 1.347\,m/sec^2$$ to the left.

The answer provided in the question seems to have made the mistake of assuming that $$G$$ goes to the right half as fast as A goes to the left. They didn't realize that $$G$$ is taking $$A$$ with it. That is really the entire point behind this classic problem.

This is how you were meant to work the problem -

1. Gather the torque terms and write an acceleration equation in terms of the unknowns at the no-slip limit.
2. Gather the force terms and write an acceleration equation in terms of the unknowns.
3. Relate G acceleration $$a_g$$ to belt acceleration $$a_b$$ via the unknown rotational acceleration $$\alpha$$.
4. And lastly, note that $$a_b = - a_g$$.

Four equations and four unknowns $$\{T,a_b,a_g,\alpha\}$$ - solve them.

1. Taking moments about $$G$$: $$\quad\alpha = [(-2452.5\,N)*1.6\,m+T*0.8\,m]/I_g$$
2. Summing forces on spool: $$\quad a_g=[(-2452.5\,N) + T]/M_g$$
3. Relating $$a_b$$ to $$a_g$$:$$\quad a_b=a_g + \alpha*1.6\,m$$
4. Relating $$a_b$$ to $$a_g$$:$$\quad a_b= -a_g$$

Since the conveyor belt is resting, the last equation does hold's true. The fact that it doesn't, suggests to me that there is some numerical error in the calculations.

I've run through your equations and they seem ok. I couldn't follow all your conventions from your sketch, so I tried solving the problem myself.

The results I got are slightly different. i.e. I got

• T: 3126.14
• Fs: 2452.5 (Same)
• N: 4905.0 (same)
• alpha: -1.684 rad/s^2(clockwise direction)
• aGx: 1.347 m/s^2 (moving to the positive x)
• a_T: -1.347 m/s^2 (moving towards the positive y)

You see in my results the relationship you are questioning does indeed hold true.

Since there are those discrepancies I wanted to ask, if the numbers you presented are the solutions given by your teacher, or if they are your calculations.

• It is in fact not my teacher. I am just helping a student. He will send a mail to his teacher. I will post a reaction here, but it can take some time. I will also put here my own results later this weekend such that we can compare. Aug 14, 2020 at 22:41
• I have got the same results as you. Just like Phil Sweet. The teacher must have made a mistake. Strange that none of the students made a remark about this mistake in the past. Aug 15, 2020 at 23:49