Let's say we have a beam with pinned connections at both ends. The beam is subjected to axial load $P$. The beam has a cross sectional area $A$, radius of gyration $r$, distance from the neutral axis to the extreme fiber $z$, length $L$ and theoretical Euler buckling load $P_e$.

It is impossible to manufacture beams that are perfectly straight, so we assume the beam as an initial maximum deflection at the midpoint, $d$.

The maximal stress occurs at the midpoint of the beam, on the extreme fiber looking from the neutral axis. This stress is the sum of direct compressive stress $\sigma_{c}$ and bending stress $\sigma_{b}$:


where $\mu$ is an imperfection factor that captures the effect initial imperfection.

We cannot predict $\mu$ exactly as it is related to manufacturing but we can assume its maximum values. In Eurocode it is assumed that $$\mu=\alpha(\lambda-0.2)$$

where $\lambda=\frac{L}{r}$, also called slenderness and $\alpha$ is a constant chosen from cross sectional properties. The assumption therefore is, that the imperfection factor is proportional to slenderness of the beam with some constant of proportionality $\alpha$. It is reasonable assumption; longer and thinner the beam is, more "crookedness" can be expected to be present after fabrication of the beam.

$\alpha$ is said to, among other things, to capture the effect of residual stresses due to manufacturing. Whether the beam is welded together or hot rolled affects the choice of $\alpha$. I don't see why this is a logical way of including residual stresses. The imperfection factor $\mu$ appears only in $\sigma_b$, which implies that if the initial deflection is negligeable, $\sigma_{max}$ equals just $\frac{P}{A}$ and the residual stress doesn't matter. But surely the residual stress matters in simple compression too?

Shouldn't a more logical way be something like this:


with some appropriate expression for $\sigma_{residual}$ involving similar factor to $\alpha$? I get that the existing method does work, but I don't understand why.


The $\alpha$ factors in the Eurocodes is empirical, and are based on test data gathered over many years.

Your theoretical approach is much too simple. For example the residual stresses from assembling a beam into a bolted structure are not necessarily "simple compression" - they may include bending, torsion and local stress concentrations (e.g. from misaligned bolt holes) - and might even depend on factors like the direction the sun was shining on the beams (causing non-uniform thermal expansion) while they were being assembled!


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.