1
$\begingroup$

An accepted method of leak testing a test piece is by using a differential measurement between it and a reference such as in the schematic here - why might one bother doing this as opposed to just comparing your test piece alone to a predefined or recorded leak rate, or curve?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I would imagine for the sake of speed and accuracy, especially for large vessels/pipes. Using some of the "classic" methods like pressure decay, vacuum decay or hydrostatic tests can take forever with a really small leak or a large volume (large pressure vessel or long pipeline) and also gets progressively less accurate the larger the volume/vessel tested. $\endgroup$ – Gwyn Jul 15 at 12:32
  • $\begingroup$ @gwyn good point, I think being able to get more accurate and precise decay rates by doing it differentially rather than just a gauge measurement is probably the main reason in reality $\endgroup$ – Oliver Walters Jul 20 at 20:38
3
$\begingroup$

Pressures change in a vessel based on ambient conditions. The reference volume removes that source of error.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.