4
$\begingroup$

Here's a typical outdoor gas stove:

enter image description here

It is fed by a low-pressure gas supply in the form of a camping cartridge or via an LPG cylinder connected to a low-pressure regulator (around 30mbar) like this one:

enter image description here

My question is: is it possible to increase the heat output of the burner by connecting two low-pressure supplies in parallel via a T-piece like this one?

enter image description here

Would this actually result in double the gas flow/double the heat output, or would the stove itself impose some limitation on the maximum pressure of gas able to flow through it (excluding the obvious extreme cases of catastrophically high pressure where the stove or pipes might crack)?

How dangerous is it? Obviously I assume it's not a recommended procedure and it probably has safety considerations, but for example would doubling a low-pressure supply from 30mbar to 60mbar pose a serious risk, or are appliances in general built to withstand far higher pressures than this? I know standard gas hoses, for example, can withstand pressures of 20 bar (100x higher than low pressure canisters).

Is there a way of determining whether an appliance will be able to handle higher flow?

I've seen this done on cheap/flimsy camping stoves so I assume it's not a catastrophic risk especially with better-made burners.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You’ve misunderstood the video you linked - he didn’t add a second canister to the same burner, he added a second burner (with its own canister) the the same stove. $\endgroup$
    – Jonathan R Swift
    May 20, 2020 at 9:35
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "is it possible to increase the heat output" of a burner. Yes, if you know what you're doing, which you don't. - "Is it safe to do so" on a portable stove. No. $\endgroup$
    – Mazura
    May 21, 2020 at 0:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps an "outdoor stove windshield" would work, as less hot air will be blown away and wasted. I see reviews saying things like "it cuts my time to boil water by almost half" and "think my burgers cooked a lot quicker." $\endgroup$
    – Andrew Morton
    May 21, 2020 at 13:26

4 Answers 4

Reset to default
10
$\begingroup$

is it possible to increase the heat output of the burner by connecting two low-pressure supplies in parallel via a T-piece like this one?

The primary factor is gas pressure at the tee. If the gas pressure drop from the low pressure regulator to the tee is negligible and the first tank & low pressure regulator is able to supply enough gas to maintain 30 mbar then a second tank & regulator also set at 30 mbar will not permit extra flow to the stove. If the pressure drop from the first pressure regulator to the tee is significant, though, then the second gas input will increase total flow to the stove.

The best method for increasing gas flowrate is to increase the low pressure regulator setpoint. You can use equations such as this one to estimate flowrates through the different hoses although parallel flow means you'll have to solve for pressure at the tee intersection iteratively. Or try and make flow paths from each tank symmetrical.

Small threaded fittings often are rated for high pressures well above 10 bar due to scaling laws but you should check, wear eye protection, keep electronics away from your work area, and have a second person nearby with a fire extinguisher in case an uncontrolled fire does occur.

Other issues to be aware of regarding the burner design incide:

  • Air/fuel ratio

  • Gas velocities and Venturi effect (for drawing air into gas stream)

Here is a set of presentation slides with vocabulary that may be useful for your own research. Beware that it's possible to lose ignition due to insufficient mixing of enough air with the fuel. This means you'll probably have to modify stove fittings that affect this mixing process.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, that was very helpful. So basically I'd have to get an adjustable regulator (or one with a higher output)? $\endgroup$
    – WackGet
    May 20, 2020 at 16:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Manufacturers (at least for US and Canada markets) probably restrict their stoves' advertised capabilities in order to meet the requirements of "Outdoor Cooking Gas Appliances (ANSI Z21.58 / CSA 1.6)", currently a voluntary standard which could be made a mandatory standard by the US or Canada. To see exactly what these requirements are, you'll have to pay about 500 USD to find out. See also ZNSI Z21.45, and Z21.54. $\endgroup$
    – baltakatei
    May 20, 2020 at 18:17
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @WackGet, going from 30 mbar to 50 mbar isn't "slightly". If a rating doesn't give a tolerance range, a good rule of thumb is 10%: your stove should work correctly at 27 mbar or 33 mbar. At 50 mbar, even if nothing breaks, the increased output could heat things that aren't supposed to get hot, or the increased gas flow could mix poorly with air, producing soot buildup and carbon-monoxide emissions, or other problems. $\endgroup$
    – Mark
    May 20, 2020 at 22:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @nick012000 there's safety against catastrophic failure and there's safety against foreseeably hazardous operation. Overly large flames would fall into the latter category, presenting a similar hazard to using it in strong winds or with a too-small pot. If you design it to be safe at twice the regulated pressure, it won't work very well at the regulated pressure. However, it might be worth testing in controlled conditions, if there aren't any plastic or soldered parts closer than the end of the hose. $\endgroup$
    – Chris H
    May 21, 2020 at 11:08
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Blowout and even leakage aren't an issue going from 30 to 50 mbar. note that there are 37mbar regulators for propane in some places, which might be a better option (and easier to get) than 50 mbar. More importantly than a fire extinguisher when testing would be a long enough hose after the valve that you could be sure of shutting off the cylinder if you ended up with large flames. $\endgroup$
    – Chris H
    May 21, 2020 at 11:11
9
$\begingroup$

No, connecting two tanks together will not double the flow.

The regulators fitted to tanks limit the pressure and flow rate so all you do is double the amount of gas the burner has available ie doubles the time of use.

Do NOT interfere with the regulators.

There are automatic change over systems that have both tanks connected and it switches over when one is empty.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
12
  • $\begingroup$ You can makethe answer even clearer by adding something along the lines: having two bottle does not double pressure in any way. The working pressure is controlled by the regulator. $\endgroup$
    – mart
    May 20, 2020 at 6:33
  • $\begingroup$ @mart did I put “limit the pressure and flow rate”? $\endgroup$
    – Solar Mike
    May 20, 2020 at 6:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mart Given the use of English by the OP I don’t think there will be an issue. $\endgroup$
    – Solar Mike
    May 20, 2020 at 6:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @WackGet no, each regulator will work at 30mbar - well one will be more than the other so it will work first... $\endgroup$
    – Solar Mike
    May 20, 2020 at 16:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @WackGet means you know when one is empty you can get a replacement and not run out. $\endgroup$
    – Solar Mike
    May 20, 2020 at 17:16
2
$\begingroup$

No. The regulator itself will see to that. It's around 30 millibars - 3/100 0f a Bar. The pressure inside a gas cylinder is around 10 Bars - 3,000 times that of what gets into your stove!

It wouldn't matter if you had ten cylinders all feeding the regulator, it could still only deliver that 30 millibars to the stove.

The only way to get more gas, therefore more heat would be to chamge the regulator. There are plenty on the market - 3 Bars is common. but don't do it!

The stove has been designed to run happily on those 30 millibars - components and joints will comfortably cope with that (very low) pressure. Much more, and it gets very dangerous - from an exploding into bits point of view from the pressure, let alone exploding in flames!

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

There is a mathematical formula called "The Hanson Theorum" basically it's the calculating the area of a circle, very accurate without the use of Pi.

Imagine a pipe with a $10cm$ in diameter bore, well the calculation is $10 x 10$ (to get the square of the bore) and multiply it by "The Hanson Theorum" which is $0.78$.

The calculation is: $10^{2}\cdot 0.78cm = 78cm^{2}$ of bore area.

If your gas jet is say $0.3mm$ we can create a higher gas flow, by boring that jet out to a slightly larger size with either a specialist drill size or some fine guitar wire... This will increase the gas flow, but at the same pressure. The regulator, should be able to cope with a $20 - 30\%$ greater flow.

So let's assume the jet is:$0.3mm \rightarrow 0.3\cdot 0.3 \cdot 0.78 = 0.07mm^{2}$ of jet bore area

Now if we want to increase the flow rate, by $20\%$ - that means we need to figure out what a jet bore $20\%$ larger is IN AREA, not diameter, the simple maths.

$$ (10+2)\cdot 7 = 0.084 \rightarrow \text{of area} $$ $$ 0.084 = 0.327\cdot 0.327 \cdot 0.78 = \dots \rightarrow \text{when converting back to diameter} $$

My brain is tired.... So you have to increase the jet size from $0.3mm$ to $0.327mm$ in diameter.

OK you can drill them out - with a special drill or you can scrap them out with a piece of 0.009" or $0.23mm$ steel guitar wire... with a diagonally cut end, and a small drilling machine etc.. and just scrape away - you will get the technique... or you can hammed the wire into a square or rectangular shape....

Since you really are ONLY reboring it by a hair or two's increase in diameter.... it's not much and then you can see if your stove works well. Try to make the issue of small shavings in terms of rejetting the stove, rather than way too big.

If you go too big first go, your regulator may not flow that amount of gas AND OR your you may need to enlargen the air mixing stage, to get a hot clean flame, instead of a sooty yellow flame...

Yellow flames also produce Carbon Monoxide which is lethal in significant amounts in confined spaces.... and people under some conditions - like it's freezing cold, they are in a snow storm and the only place to cook is inside the little tent...

My little butane can single burner portable camping stove - on cold days like 10C, the burning rate which is based upon the boiling rate of the gas, which slows down as the evaporating gas, chills the liquid gas, so it cools and boils off at an incrediby slow rate, which means cooking a big meal in a pot takes 10 x as long as cooking on a 35C day.... So I need to fiddle with the jet a little to increase the rate of gas flow and not fiddle around much to make the stove improvements into a major engineering project, rather than a simple improvement.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 0.78, your Hanson theorem is basically Pi /4 3.1415926 / 4 = 0.785. So you are still using Pi but don't realize. $\endgroup$
    – Solar Mike
    Jul 6, 2020 at 13:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.