I am trying to derive a heat budget model to estimate the temprature of very small a stationary vertical cylinder (1mm) under environmental conditions. Imagine a wooden stick. Simply put, I have

R = H InSW * albedo + sigma * emissivity * Tcylinder^4 = rho_air * cp * (Tcylinder - Tair)/rH.


  • R = sum of radiative components
  • H = convective components (latent heat and conduction ignore)
  • InSW = Incident solar radiation observed by a pyranometer
  • albedo = albedo of the cylinder
  • sigma = ste-boltz constant
  • emissivity = emissivity of the cylinder to longwave IR
  • Tcylinder = temperature cylinder
  • rho_air = density of the air
  • cp = heat capacity of the air
  • rH = resistance to convection

This is the basis of a heat budget model, but how do I incorporate the fact that its a cylinder? I've managed to find information about how to deal with rH with the forced and natural convections, so what I'm more concerned about is the radiative components. Is it alright for me to leave them like this or do I need to start accounting for the geometry and its potential impact on the intercepted light and resistance to radiative transfer?


  • $\begingroup$ The buzzword is "geometry factor" or "shape factor" to account for the fact that some parts of the complete system will be in the shadow of other parts (e.g. you seem to have ignored radiation from the ground and other "environmental" sources, as well as isolation). $\endgroup$ – alephzero Feb 7 '20 at 1:55

You certainly need to take account of the shape of the object somehow.

As a simple example, consider a sphere of radius $r$ in space where everything except solar radiation can be ignored.

The cross section area of the sphere which is absorbing solar radiation is $\pi r^2$ but the surface area which is emitting it is $4 \pi r^2$. So the radiative heat balance equation looks something like $4 \pi r^2 T_{\text{sphere}}^4 = \pi r^2 T_{\text{sun}}^4$ and in the equilibrium state (assuming the sphere has high conductivity so the surface temperature is uniform) will be $T_{\text{sphere}}= T_{\text{sun}}/\sqrt 2$.

For a unsymmetrical body like a cylinder, the amount of radiation absorbed will depend on the orientation of the cylinder relative to the sun, but the amount emitted will not.

  • $\begingroup$ I see. Does that mean I need to consider the surface area of the cylinder when computing its total radiative output? However, my units are in W/m2 and so I can't really add the surface area, right? Unless considering the problem in w/m2 is not a good approach? $\endgroup$ – MorningGlory Feb 9 '20 at 14:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.