I have following example (the question is at the bottom):

enter image description here

The load distribution $q$ is constant. I add condition of zero bend in center of the beam, $w_B = 0$, and the assumption $F_{RA} = F_{RC}$. So I have:

$$F_{RA} + F_{RB} + F_{RC} = q\cdot 2 L$$ $$F_{RB} = 2 q L-2 F_{RA}$$

Divide beam to two sections (from left)

I. $x_1\in\{ 0;L\}$

$$M(x_1) = F_{RA} \cdot x_1 - q \frac{x_1^2}{2}$$ $$\frac{\partial M(x_1)}{\partial F_{RB}}=0$$

II. $x_2 \in\{0;L\}$

$$M(x_2) = F_{RA} (L + x_2) + F_{RB}\cdot x_2 - q \frac{(L + x_2)^2}{2}$$ $$\frac{\partial M(x_2)}{\partial F_{RB}}=x_2$$

Use condition $w_B = 0$ $$w_b = 0 = \frac{1}{E\cdot I_z} \left ( \int_0^L M(x1) \cdot \frac{\partial M(x_1)}{\partial F_{RB}} dx_1 + \int_0^L M(x2) \cdot \frac{\partial M(x_2)}{\partial F_{RB}} dx_2 \right )$$

$$0 = \int_0^L M(x2) \cdot \frac{\partial M(x_2)}{\partial F_{RB}} dx_2 = \\ \int_0^L \left ( F_{RA} (l + x_2) + F_{RB}\cdot x_2 - q \frac{(l + x_2)^2}{2} \right ) \cdot x_2 dx_2 $$

Substitute for $F_{RB}$

$$\int_0^L \left ( F_{RA} (l + x_2) + (2 q L-2 F_{RA})\cdot x_2 - q \frac{(l + x_2)^2}{2} \right ) \cdot x_2 dx_2 $$

Solve for $F_{RA}$

$$F_{RA} = \frac{1}{4} q l$$

It's this result correct? It seems suspicious to me. I supposed $F_{RB}\geq F_{RA}.$

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ AISC Steel Construction Manual Tables 3-22c and 3-23 (14th Edition) are extremely useful for gut-checks of this type. slideshow available here $\endgroup$ – CableStay Aug 19 '15 at 21:18

This problem can be simplified by observing the symmetry. This allows us to solve only one side, considering it as a beam of span $L$ which is fixed and pinned:

enter image description here

Now, reactions are really just concentrated loads, so lets replace that pinned support with a concentrated vertical load $P$. To obtain $P$, we first take a look at how the beam deforms without the pinned support (i.e. just the cantilever). A simple cantilever has a total vertical displacement at the end equal to $d_q = \dfrac{q\cdot L^4}{8EI}$. Now, I lied. A reaction isn't just a concentrated load. It's also knowledge of the true displacement. We know that the end of the cantilever actually has a displacement equal to 0. Therefore, the concentrated load $P$ has to create a displacement that cancels out the value we calculated above. Now, a cantilever with a concentrated load at its extremity has a vertical displacement equal to $d_P = \dfrac{P\cdot L^3}{3EI}$.

Now, to cancel out, we need $d_q = d_P$. Therefore, we have

$\dfrac{q\cdot L^4}{8EI} = \dfrac{P\cdot L^3}{3EI} \therefore P = \dfrac{3qL}{8}$

enter image description here

So $F_{RA} = F_{RC} =\dfrac{3qL}{8}$ and $F_{RB} = 2\cdot\dfrac{5qL}{8}$ (it's times two, once for each side of the real beam).

It anyone's interested, the figures were created with Ftool, a free 2D analysis tool.


I can see the partial derivative, $\frac{\partial M(x_1)}{\partial F_{RB}}=0$ on your X1 section is actually not correct, it should be " = x".

An easy hand calculating method of these simple problems is using moment distribution method. Using symmetry we start from left hand span and assume fix ends initially then release them.

RA = RB ql/2 and MA = MB = ql^2/12.
now we release the joint A half of the moment is carried to joint be so now the MB = ql^2/12 + ql^/24 = 3ql^2/24 = ql^2/8.
Now we calculate final RA after moment distribution: RA = ql/2 - ql/8 = 3ql/8.
We set the RC = 3ql/8 too by symmetry. Now RB = 2ql - 6ql/8 = 10ql/8. 10/8 ql = 5/4 ql.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.