0
$\begingroup$

addition of shearing forces and stresses I would like to ask for help regarding the summation of non parallel shearing forces acting on an elastic body. In the image force F (Left to right direction,in yellow) acts on the top horizontal surface "A" of an elastic cuboid body that is attached to the table only at its bottom surface. I know how to calculate the stress and strain. But what happen if a second force "F_vertical" (in black) acts on the top portion of the vertical surface facing the reader, again direction left to right. how do I add the stress and strain imposed by both forces. (I am a physician not an an engineer or physicist ).

thank you Yehuda Raveh

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If the deformations are small you can just use linear superposition, i.e., compute the stresses for each loading condition separately and add them up. $\endgroup$ – Biswajit Banerjee Dec 11 '18 at 2:17
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. deformations are very small. I do know that if force F acted alone, the shear stress would be F/A and strain would be delta-X /L. I don't know how to calculate stress and strain for F_vertical alone. thank you. Yehuda $\endgroup$ – Yehuda Raveh Dec 13 '18 at 11:59
  • $\begingroup$ For a shear traction $t_v = F_{v}/A_v$, you will have to solve a boundary value problem. That's probably hard to do by hand and a computational tool such as finite elements will be easier. The stresses and strains in the block will not be homogeneous. However, if you just want a rough estimate, just assume that the force $F_v$ acts over the entire area and do the calculation as you would for $F$ alone. $\endgroup$ – Biswajit Banerjee Dec 14 '18 at 20:24
1
$\begingroup$

There's some ambiguity in your diagram and description because you have one force acting on a point and another force acting over a portion of a surface. Also, although you say, "I know how to calculate the stress and strain [for the first loading configuration]," it's not clear which idealizations you're applying to get these answers.

For example, one possible idealization is that the force $F$ acts over the entire top surface, thus producing a state of pure shear throughout the body. (An equal and opposite force would act over the bottom surface due to its attachment to the table.) Assuming that the $z$-axis points in the upward vertical direction, the original state of stress would be $$\sigma = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & F/A_\mathrm{top} \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ F/A_\mathrm{top} & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix},$$

where $A_\mathrm{top}$ is the cross-sectional area of the top surface.

(If you don't apply this idealization of $F$ acting across the entire top, then you'll get a stress variation around the point where $F$ is drawn as acting. Think about pushing at a single location on a very compliant material such as a sponge; most likely, you'll see a lot more deformation around the point your finger touches than elsewhere.)

Inside the material, any small element would be subjected to the following stress state:

enter image description here

These four forces are all necessary to apply a state of pure shear upon an internal element; any fewer would result in translation and/or rotation. This stress state becomes poorly defined at the surface because you're not applying any upward or downward forces; the material is effectively generating these forces internally.

So that's just the simple case of a single force! The revised state of stress is more complex. Just slightly inside the material where the force $F_\mathrm{vertical}$ is applied, the revised stress state is

$$\sigma^\prime = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & F_\mathrm{vertical}/A_\mathrm{side} & F/A_\mathrm{top} \\ F_\mathrm{vertical}/A_\mathrm{side} & 0 & 0 \\ F/A_\mathrm{top} & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix},$$

where $A_\mathrm{side}$ includes only the area upon which $F_\mathrm{vertical}$ acts.

Elsewhere in the block, however, the stress will vary. The force on the bottom, which originally needed to resist only $F$, now must resist a torque generated from the off-center application of $F_\mathrm{vertical}$. I don't know of a solution for the general state of stress; you may need to use finite element analysis for that.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ sorry for the ambiguity. Indeed force F applies to all top surface "A". I do know that if force F acted alone, the shear stress would be F/A and strain would be delta-X /L. I am trying to learn the matrices you wrote. If there is simpler way to express the sum of the two shearing forces, please let me know. $\endgroup$ – Yehuda Raveh Dec 13 '18 at 11:50
  • $\begingroup$ There is the von Mises stress, which is a coordinate-system-invariant number that expresses the stress state. For a couple of shear stresses, the von Mises stress would be $\sigma_\mathrm{vM}=\sqrt{3(\sigma_{12}^2+\sigma_{13}^2)}$. But again, note that this will vary throughout the material because $F_\mathrm{vertical}$ is asymmetrically applied. $\endgroup$ – Chemomechanics Dec 13 '18 at 15:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.