0
$\begingroup$

I have a pipe network with laminar flow (peak output from the pump gives a Reynolds number around 1100).

I have some test data for the network and the results are really odd to me; I cannot explain the flow distribution using standard theory for K values or assigning equivalent lengths to pipe fittings. The results look like this:

enter image description here

Branches A and B are pipes of the same diameter (0.5cm), and are fed, via a T-junction by a pipe with double their diameter (1cm). The branches are the same length, the only difference between them is one has 2 holes in it (of 2mm diameter at the tip, and 1mm diameter at slightly downstream of midspan), the other only has 1 hole (of 1mm diameter, at the tip).

This minor geometrical difference causes 19 times more flow to go down branch B, according to my test results. But the theory I have for equivalent lengths of pipe suggests this shouldn't happen.

I suspect it's because the data only applies to turbulent flows. I also am doubting the accuracy of the test data (I did not conduct the test) given that large discrepancy between the two branches.

Does any body know a source of equivalent lengths of pipe/k factors that are valid for slow moving (laminar) flows? (below 2000 Re)

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Under laminar flow, you can use Hagen-Poiseuille model of flow, namely $$f = \frac{64}{Re}$$ The Darcy friction factor relates to the head loss coefficient $K$ by $$ K = f \frac{L}{d}$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.