When searching for this online I did not seem to be able to find any examples of this, which might imply that this idea does not work (or I did not use the right search terms). I have seen the use of two counter rotating fans, but this would probably still impart rotational energy to the flow after the second fan. I think a jet engine is an example of what I mean, but I at least have not seen other applied use cases. Intuitively I would think that adding stationary blades after the driven rotating ones could improve performance (if the total weight is not an issue). Namely those stationary blades can convert some of the rotational energy of the fluid, imparted by the rotating fan blades, into (linear) kinetic energy of the fluid. So increase the mean flow rate and/or head pressure. Also converting and thus reducing the rotational energy should also reduce friction between the fluid and the wall of the duct. Since a rotating fluid flowing through a duct has a higher velocity near the wall then a none rotating fluid.

Would (some of) these gains be counteracted by a higher torque required to keep the rotating blades spinning at the same speed? Or might the gains at typical speeds be too low?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I believe the term you are after is stator $\endgroup$
    – L Selter
    Commented Nov 6, 2017 at 8:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Jet engines commonly have stationary sets of blades between rotating ones, for this reason. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2017 at 12:43

1 Answer 1


Yes, it depends on if it is cost effective; for a consumer window fan = No. For a consumer vacuum cleaner =Yes. Of the jet engines I have seen , every stage of blades ( rotating) has a stage of vanes ( stationary).... Except the first stage/fan.

  • $\begingroup$ And they all rotate in the same direction. Once a stator vanes are present, no need of counter-rotation. $\endgroup$
    – FarO
    Commented Feb 19, 2020 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ The gas stream is rotating after it leaves the rotating blades; The stationary vanes redirect the rotating gas straight into the next stage of blades. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 20, 2020 at 21:50
  • $\begingroup$ I know turbines. What I mean is that the choice of counter-rotating stages (see original question) is not needed if you put stator vanes. $\endgroup$
    – FarO
    Commented Feb 21, 2020 at 8:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.