Am I correct in saying that the residual stress of a component, that has undergone plastic deformation and then unloaded, is determined fully by the elastic component of the residual strain? And if so, is this because the plastic component is permanently deformed and hence is in a state of equilibrium unlike the elastic strain which is held out if equilibrium by the plastic deformation?

This makes sense in my head but the notes I am using don't strictly state this but instead say: "the residual stress is related to the residual elastic strain".

Thanks for your help!

  • $\begingroup$ you may be confusing yourself to think the residual stress state is somehow "out of equilibrium" $\endgroup$ – agentp Apr 18 '17 at 11:50

I think this is really a question about the terminology. The concept of "the elastic component of the residual strain" may be confusing, until you take it apart to see what it really means.

The total strain in the material is well defined - it is what a strain gauge would measure.

If the structure has undergone plastic deformation, the total strain may be non-zero even when there are no applied loads - in other words, the structure has been permanently deformed from its initial shape. That is what residual strain means.

For continuum mechanics, it is useful to split up the total strain into different components, such as plastic strain, creep strain, thermal strain, elastic strain, etc. These are theoretical concepts, and by definition the elastic strain is the only component which is related to the elastic stress.

As an example that doesn't involve any nonlinear or time-dependent behaviour, consider a bar of material with both ends rigidly fixed, where the bar is then heated. The total strain is zero, because the length of the bar remains constant. However there is a non-zero thermal strain (equal to what the thermal expansion would be if the bar was not fixed) and an equal-and-opposite elastic strain which makes the total strain zero. The stress in the bar depends only on the elastic strain.

So to summarize the answer, "the elastic component of the residual strain" and "the residual elastic strain" are two names for exactly the same thing.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the detailed answer! I realise the terminology in my original question was used badly! The statement "the stress is the bar depends only on elastic strain" is what I'm getting at. Does this mean that the residual stress is due to only elastic strain (which occurs due to a constraint preventing the material returning to it's original shape)? As the plastic strain is permanent and the particles have a new equilibrium. Hope that makes sense! $\endgroup$ – massey95 Apr 19 '17 at 15:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.