0
$\begingroup$

Can someone explain why the M is assigned to be anticlockwise here ?

1 When i assign it as clockwise , i will get -P(δ -v) , which is different from the author ... If i do so , then , all the sign will be different Can i do so ? Why ?

or the second example here , i can understand that M = -Pv , since M+Pv = 0 at either end when it's in equlibrium.

P/s : I know the the sign convention of the bending moment of beam is positive when the beam upwards as shown ...

For the first example , i gt M+P(∂-v) = 0 , so M = - P(∂-v) . I am not sure whether is my concept correct or not . 2

3

4

5

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

You choose your coordinate system with a FBD, however the different pin supports have to counteract the exerted force to be static. Typically bending moments are defined using the rights hand rule. In example 1, M is negative by convention only because of the orientation typically used. Notice the author has x as the y axis. You can also ignore all that as the anti clockwise moment is opposing the bending moment caused by P (negative, aka clockwise). It's a cut section.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Simple. The bending moment caused by $P\delta$ is clockwise, so the bending moment reaction must be counter-clockwise to resist it. The bending equilibrium equation should be

$$\begin{gather} \sum M_{support} = M + (-P\delta) = 0 \\ \therefore M = P\delta \end{gather}$$

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean the case2 ? buckling of column with pin support ? We can see that M = -Pv , which is M+Pv = 0 , not M-P𝛿 = 0 , M =- P𝛿 as you showed . Why you said that M = P𝛿 ? $\endgroup$ – kelvinmacks Dec 25 '16 at 12:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @kelvinmacks: Your question, as I understand it, is for the first example (cantilevered). My answer is therefore for the first example. $\endgroup$ – Wasabi♦ Dec 25 '16 at 12:39
  • $\begingroup$ OK, for the second example, why it's M = - Pv? $\endgroup$ – kelvinmacks Dec 25 '16 at 12:41
  • $\begingroup$ why the M has same direction with Pv? $\endgroup$ – kelvinmacks Dec 25 '16 at 12:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @kelvinmacks: Oh, woops, sorry. Brain fart. Counter-clockwise bending moment is positive by definition. I'll add another comment later, no time now. $\endgroup$ – Wasabi♦ Dec 27 '16 at 11:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.