Why are nuts 6-sided? Why not 4 or 8?

standard 6-sided nut

  • $\begingroup$ For that matter, why not 5 or 7? ;) $\endgroup$ – Air Jun 17 '16 at 20:22
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Four sided nuts do exist. $\endgroup$ – Fred Jun 18 '16 at 15:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Air We know you're joking, but any odd-sided nut can't be worked on with any adjustable (two parallel jaws) or standard box wrenches. $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft Jun 18 '16 at 20:21
  • $\begingroup$ If too many nuts had 8 sides, we'd have a global shortage of sides. $\endgroup$ – Olin Lathrop Jun 21 '16 at 11:19

There are 3, 4, 8, and 12-sided nuts, and most exotically, 5-sided nuts all in use for specific applications, but the 6-sided hex nut is most popular because it offers a good trade off between a bunch of factors:

Ease of tightening/loosening, especially in tight spaces: There are six distinct orientations you can grip a hex nut in, each 60 degrees apart. This means that if you can swing your wrench through a 60 degree arc, you can tighten the nut enough to remove the wrench and place it on the next pair of flats. In fact most open end wrenches have the jaws offset 15 degrees form the handle so that by flipping the wrench you can tighten the nut with as little as 30 degrees of access. (Box wrenches often have 12 points, allowing the same principle without the flipping.) A four sided nut would have a significant drawback that even with an offset wrench head, you would need 45 degrees of access to tighten the nut. Additionally, it's much easier to put an open end wrench on a hex nut as the two adjacent faces on the approach side guide the wrench towards the flats. By contrast, if you approach a square nut with the wrench flats not quite parallel to the nut flats, the wrench can very easily jam. Of course when there is space for access with a ratchet these considerations don't make much difference, but as people try to make machines smaller and lighter, designers often leave only the minimum access required to reach fasteners.

Torque transmitted The more points the nut has, the more likely it is that the bearing surface of the point will fail in compression and 'round over.' This problem is exacerbated by the fact that some gap has to be left between the wrench and the nut to allow for manufacturing and alignment tolerances, which significantly decreases the contract area between the wrench and the nut. In practice, it's pretty hard to round over a hex nut unless you are using an adjustable wrench (where slop in the mechanism can lead to a bigger gap between the nut and the wrench and less parallel wrench faces.) A square nut is even harder to round over, and in this aspect is more desirable than a hex nut. 12-point nuts do exist, but if the faces were flat they would round over very easily, so instead they are manufactured with points that increase the size of the torque-transmitting face.

Joint Properties Standard square nuts have a larger bearing area than their standard hex counterparts. This sometimes makes them preferable for a connection to a soft substrate like wood as they are less likely to pull through the material. Because square nuts can accommodate a greater gap between the wrench and the nut, they can be used in captive situations like weld-on cage nuts, or self-aligning server rack nuts. One common use for square nuts is on blind, low strength connections to soft wood. The bolt can be tightened from one side and the nut will embed itself in the wood, with the large faces preventing it from cutting a counter-bore into the wood. By contrast a hex nut would typically cut a circle in the wood and spin. Oversized hex nuts, thick washers, and tension control bolts all allow alternate solutions to these problems using hex nuts, but generally at a higher manufacturing cost.

Material Efficiency In order to maintain the minimum amount of material between the threads and the edge of the nut, square nuts have a fair amount of 'wasted' volume in the corners that increases the amount of metal per nut for a given screw size. As you increase the number of flats, the shape of the nut becomes closer to a circle and more material efficient. (By the same logic, when laying out a connection hex nuts take up less space whereas square nuts have to be placed further apart.) For a few nuts, this difference is negligible, but for a company that buys or produces nuts by the truckload, it would add up very quickly.

Ubiquity Even if these trade-offs changed, the simple fact that most people who work on machinery and structures have tools designed around 6-sided nuts would provide a big dis-incentive to change. Auto mechanics, for example have to buy a whole special set of tools when a car manufacturer decides to use an unusual fastener. In the case of the 5-sided nut, the very reason it is used is to be tamper resistant because very few people own wrenches that fit it, and adjustable tools designed for even-numbered polygons won't work. It is mainly used for fire hydrant fittings and valves.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Re torque transmission. Is the contact area really significantly different if there is a gap between the wrench and the nut as the area of contact is only along an edge? There is however a significant increase in the difference between the diametrically opposite edges and the spacing between the wrench faces as the number of sides on the nut is decreased. Just think of the number of nut sides increasing and tending towards being circular. $\endgroup$ – Farcher Jun 20 '16 at 22:28
  • $\begingroup$ @Farcher You're right. That language is imprecise. It's about how much metal is resisting 'rounding over' but I'm not sure what the better name would be. It isn't really shear area either... $\endgroup$ – Ethan48 Jun 28 '16 at 16:36
  • $\begingroup$ "it's pretty hard to round over a hex nut unless you are using an adjustable wrench" - A nice story about the late Sir Henry Royce (the "engineering" half of the co-founders of Rolls-Royce): if he found anyone in the workshop using an adjustable wrench for anything, he personally threw the wrench out of the window into the river that flowed nearby. And then stopped the cost of replacing the broken glass from the miscreant's wages. And when the miscreant had finished working "for free", dismissed him with no notice and no references. No HR departments back in those days! $\endgroup$ – alephzero Aug 18 '17 at 19:03

Six sides is a good compromise between being able to handle high torque and being able to get tools onto and off of it easily.

4-sided nuts can handle more torque, but are a pain to work with, especially in confined spaces.

Nuts with more than 6 sides are too easy to "round off" when a tool slips (perhaps because of poor manufacturing tolerances), rendering them useless.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ More than "manu tolerance", I think it's just the ratio of edge length to force applied that fouls things up. $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft Jun 18 '16 at 20:22
  • $\begingroup$ I think it's more about the difference between the inscribed circle's radius and the circumscribed circles radius. Since the clearance required between the wrench and the nut is pretty constant regardless of number of sides, the closer that tolerance is to the radial 'runout' the more chance of rounding the corner. Because a wrench only makes contact at the corners, the length of the side shouldn't have much to do with it. $\endgroup$ – Ethan48 Jun 18 '16 at 21:29
  • $\begingroup$ @Ethan48: Your statements are not self-consistent. Since the clearance is constant, the number of sides has a strong effect on the force at the corners. $\endgroup$ – Dave Tweed Jun 18 '16 at 21:51
  • $\begingroup$ Yes sorry, the number of sides does, but it's not because of the length of the side. What I'm getting at is that the force is only applied at the points, not along the face so it's all about the angle that force is transmitted at and how much metal there is in that direction. More sides means both a more oblique line of action and less material in that direction. $\endgroup$ – Ethan48 Jun 18 '16 at 22:02

The main reason to prefer hexagons over square or octagon section in general is that hex bar can be held in a 3-jaw self centering chuck which makes it convenient for machining operations. Hex bar is certainly the most common stock section after round and square/rectangular.

There is also the consideration that a hexagon has a natural draft angle so it will tend to be easier to drop forge in closed dies than square or octagonal sections.

You do occasionally see square nuts in some applications for example in captive nuts which sit in a cage or channel, nuts designed to be welded to plates are also sometimes square.

Also older fasteners predating mass production are more likely to be square.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ There are square nuts and 12-point nuts made in various sizes. Hex nuts have the advantage of being standardized to fit most tools and other fasteners. $\endgroup$ – user16622 Jun 18 '16 at 1:09
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What percentage of nuts produced in a year are ever held in a 3 jaw chuck? I would hazard a guess at <0.1% $\endgroup$ – Ethan48 Jun 18 '16 at 20:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Ethan48 "me too" :-) 6-sides is the best compromise between ability to apply force and ability to turn the nut one side's-worth in tight working spaces. $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft Jun 18 '16 at 20:23
  • $\begingroup$ @Ethan - "Real engineers" make their own nuts. They don't buy Far-eastern junk from Ebay ;) $\endgroup$ – alephzero Aug 18 '17 at 19:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.