Timeline for Connections between RC retaining walls and sheet pile retaining walls
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 at 13:51 | vote | accept | Smeato | ||
| S Mar 22, 2016 at 13:16 | history | bounty ended | Smeato | ||
| S Mar 22, 2016 at 13:16 | history | notice removed | Smeato | ||
| Mar 21, 2016 at 13:37 | answer | added | Amir | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 15, 2016 at 20:09 | history | edited | Air | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Mar 15, 2016 at 18:35 | answer | added | hazzey♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 15, 2016 at 16:49 | comment | added | Wasabi | Do you really need an expansion joint? Couldn't you create a monolithic connection between the two parts? After all, the sheet pile in that direction will behave like a very weak spring, it should hardly resist the thermal expansion of the concrete at all. Also, in describing your pilaster idea, you worry about the fact that sheet piles deflect quite a bit. Given that you need a joint that is stable from construction (when the piles will be vertical) until final load, I think you should actually design this joint precisely so that the piles don't deflect substantially at the joint. | |
| Mar 15, 2016 at 14:32 | history | edited | user16 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
| S Mar 15, 2016 at 13:43 | history | bounty started | Smeato | ||
| S Mar 15, 2016 at 13:43 | history | notice added | Smeato | Draw attention | |
| Mar 14, 2016 at 12:54 | history | edited | hazzey♦ |
retaining wall tag seems more appropriate than "flood" tag.
|
|
| Mar 14, 2016 at 11:59 | history | edited | Smeato | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited to add indicative dimensions
|
| Mar 14, 2016 at 11:46 | history | edited | Smeato | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 236 characters in body
|
| Mar 11, 2016 at 11:40 | history | edited | Smeato | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 11, 2016 at 11:22 | history | asked | Smeato | CC BY-SA 3.0 |