Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 22, 2016 at 0:44 comment added Robherc KV5ROB With that approach, you would run into the problem of air re-circulation through the 'thick layers' of steel wool. If you wanted to make such an approach practical, you would need to have separate section in your "outer box" for air intake/exhaust, then have either intake or exhaust from the inner (wool bagged) box communicate dirextly to the outer box, protected from the opposing-flow air through the rest of the inner box. Once sealed away from the opposing-flow, however, you could then baffle that flow with wool for sound absorption & filtration as well.
S Feb 21, 2016 at 18:56 history suggested MetaFight CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed a few typos.
Feb 21, 2016 at 18:55 review Suggested edits
S Feb 21, 2016 at 18:56
Feb 21, 2016 at 18:08 comment added Jimmy Hoffa and if I think this through, I could take that whole thing, place it in an aluminum or other case with a 3" buffer space all the way around it (including beneath so it's floating in the center) and have intake/exhaust holes (not screens) in that, and that entire thing would further act like a muffler to the air intake and exhaust...
Feb 21, 2016 at 18:04 comment added Jimmy Hoffa Steel wool is an interesting idea I hadn't thought of! That has the added benefit of being naturally porous so I wouldn't actually need independent air vents too... I could use a frame and make a sealed steel-wool-bag effectively around the entire frame with many thick layers of steel wool... This would both filter the air, and require zero individual air-vents so the sound of the air intake and exhaust would be diffused across the entire thing which would likely further dampen the sound, and cool the air. This is a very interesting thought! Thanks!
Feb 20, 2016 at 5:40 review First posts
Feb 20, 2016 at 7:12
Feb 20, 2016 at 5:37 history answered Robherc KV5ROB CC BY-SA 3.0