Timeline for Dipole antenna calculations
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3 at 14:07 | comment | added | Dave Tweed | That would depend on what's "best" for you. Like I said, the correction factor in the other formula is useful for building practical antennas. But if you start with that one, you can always trim the antenna shorter to tune it empirically. (Actually, you would just fold the ends over, so you can go back if you happen to go too far.) | |
| Aug 3 at 13:59 | comment | added | user10897549 | I think (300/MHz)/2 = dipole in meters, would be the best one. | |
| Aug 3 at 13:55 | history | answered | Dave Tweed | CC BY-SA 4.0 |