Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 14, 2015 at 4:35 answer added Paul Uszak timeline score: 5
Oct 10, 2015 at 15:17 answer added AsymLabs timeline score: 2
Sep 9, 2015 at 6:58 comment added Roel @hazzey Because it's so huge, to dig let's say 10m deep you'd need to move such vast amounts of soil - plus I guess you'd have to do it within one dry season. Maybe I'm wrong though. With modern building techniques, you could use prefab support panels (not sure what they're called in English) as you dig. At least that's what a friend of mine specializes in at the company he works - supporting big holes very close to other buildings That's mostly in inner city areas though, maybe if you're building where you have the room, it's cheaper to dig a huge hole.
Sep 9, 2015 at 1:12 history edited user16 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 79 characters in body
Sep 9, 2015 at 0:52 comment added hazzey Why did you discount the idea of digging a hole bigger than necessary and then filling the back of the wall? That is pretty much how you would do it with modern masonry.
Sep 9, 2015 at 0:08 comment added Dopeybob435 A good portion of the ability to dig and support the material is dependent upon the soils/rocks around the work. They could have weathered rock at surface level which would be self supporting and only need a strong back, hammer and chisel to create the hole of this depth (I do not recommend trying this at home). They could also use wood or cut stones to support their work as they descend into the hole if it is not self supporting. These methods have been used for millenia.
Sep 8, 2015 at 13:09 answer added Russell McMahon timeline score: 7
S Sep 8, 2015 at 11:52 history suggested Wasabi CC BY-SA 3.0
improved formatting, typos
Sep 8, 2015 at 11:11 review Suggested edits
S Sep 8, 2015 at 11:52
Sep 8, 2015 at 8:24 review First posts
Sep 8, 2015 at 11:11
Sep 8, 2015 at 8:23 history asked Roel CC BY-SA 3.0