Return to Question

We say kinetic of molecules as a function of temperature from the equipartition theorem. This means that more is the velocity or mass of the body , more the is the temperature.

My Q is why does increased motion or mass of molecules contribute to heat , increased temperature.

From this. Is it also possible to say that when velocity of molecules = 0. Then , temperature is at its coldest measure ? Since even at -20K or so. There must be some speed of the molecules where I can say that they are just slow.

I kind of also feel fire and ice also confuse with how they can be compared here ?

To conclude. All these few Q are a subtopic of my major Q i.e why does increased motion or mass of molecules contribute to heat , increased temperature.

We say kinetic of molecules as a function of temperature from the equipartition theorem. This means that more is the velocity or mass of the body , more the is the temperature.

My Q is why does increased motion or mass of molecules contribute to heat , increased temperature ?

From this. Is it also possible to say that when velocity of molecules = 0. Then , temperature is at its coldest measure ? Since even at -20K or so. There must be some speed of the molecules where I can say that they are just slow.

I kind of also feel fire and ice also confuse with how they can be compared here ?

To conclude. All these few Q are a subtopic of my major Q i.e why does increased motion or mass of molecules contribute to heat , increased temperature.

We say kinetic of molecules as a function of temperature from the equipartition theorem. This means that more is the velocity or mass of the body , more the is the temperature.

My Q is why does increased motion or mass of molecules contribute to heat , increased temperature.

From this. Is it also possible to say that when velocity of molecules = 0. Then , temperature is at its coldest measure ? Since even at -20K or so. There must be some speed of the molecules where I can say that they are just slow.

We say kinetic of molecules as a function of temperature from the equipartition theorem. This means that more is the velocity or mass of the body , more the is the temperature.

My Q is why does increased motion or mass of molecules contribute to heat , increased temperature.

From this. Is it also possible to say that when velocity of molecules = 0. Then , temperature is at its coldest measure ? Since even at -20K or so. There must be some speed of the molecules where I can say that they are just slow.

I kind of also feel fire and ice also confuse with how they can be compared here ?

To conclude. All these few Q are a subtopic of my major Q i.e why does increased motion or mass of molecules contribute to heat , increased temperature.

We say kinetic of molecules as a function of temperature from the equipartition theorem. This means that more is the velocity or mass of the body , more the is the temperature.

My Q is why does increased motion or mass of molecules contribute to heat , increased temperature.

From this. Is it also possible to say that when velocity of molecules = 0. Then , temperature is at its coldest measure ? Since even at -20K or so. There must be some speed of the molecules.

We say kinetic of molecules as a function of temperature from the equipartition theorem. This means that more is the velocity or mass of the body , more the is the temperature.

My Q is why does increased motion or mass of molecules contribute to heat , increased temperature.

From this. Is it also possible to say that when velocity of molecules = 0. Then , temperature is at its coldest measure ? Since even at -20K or so. There must be some speed of the molecules where I can say that they are just slow.