Skip to main content
Became Hot Network Question
added 145 characters in body
Source Link
KMC
  • 217
  • 2
  • 8

I was given the following formula to relate the change of area against the change of length of an electric wire with a Poisson ratio:

$ {\Delta A \over A} = -2 \nu {\Delta L \over L} $

where $ \Delta A \over A $ represents the change in cross-sectional area of the wire due to the transverse strain as the wire gets pulled longitudinally stretching length $ L $ to $ L+\Delta L$.

I don't get how this equation is derived. The Poisson ratio is defined by $ \nu = -{\epsilon_{lateral} \over {\epsilon_{longitudinal}} } = - {{\Delta d / d} \over {\Delta L / L}} $ where $ d $ is the diameter of the cross section. $ {\Delta A \over A} = {{0.25\pi(d+\Delta d)^2 - 0.25\pi d^2} \over {0.25\pi d^2}} $ and am just not sure where to go from here...Then the ratio of the area:

$ {\Delta A \over A} = {{0.25\pi(d+\Delta d)^2 - 0.25\pi d^2} \over {0.25\pi d^2}} = {{2d \Delta d} \over d^2} + {{\Delta d^2} \over {d^2}} = -2 \nu { \Delta L \over L} + \big( \nu {\Delta L \over L} \big)^2 \neq -2 \nu {\Delta L \over L} $

I was given the following formula to relate the change of area against the change of length of an electric wire with a Poisson ratio:

$ {\Delta A \over A} = -2 \nu {\Delta L \over L} $

where $ \Delta A \over A $ represents the change in cross-sectional area of the wire due to the transverse strain as the wire gets pulled longitudinally stretching length $ L $ to $ L+\Delta L$.

I don't get how this equation is derived. The Poisson ratio is defined by $ \nu = -{\epsilon_{lateral} \over {\epsilon_{longitudinal}} } = - {{\Delta d / d} \over {\Delta L / L}} $ where $ d $ is the diameter of the cross section. $ {\Delta A \over A} = {{0.25\pi(d+\Delta d)^2 - 0.25\pi d^2} \over {0.25\pi d^2}} $ and am just not sure where to go from here...

I was given the following formula to relate the change of area against the change of length of an electric wire with a Poisson ratio:

$ {\Delta A \over A} = -2 \nu {\Delta L \over L} $

where $ \Delta A \over A $ represents the change in cross-sectional area of the wire due to the transverse strain as the wire gets pulled longitudinally stretching length $ L $ to $ L+\Delta L$.

I don't get how this equation is derived. The Poisson ratio is defined by $ \nu = -{\epsilon_{lateral} \over {\epsilon_{longitudinal}} } = - {{\Delta d / d} \over {\Delta L / L}} $ where $ d $ is the diameter of the cross section. Then the ratio of the area:

$ {\Delta A \over A} = {{0.25\pi(d+\Delta d)^2 - 0.25\pi d^2} \over {0.25\pi d^2}} = {{2d \Delta d} \over d^2} + {{\Delta d^2} \over {d^2}} = -2 \nu { \Delta L \over L} + \big( \nu {\Delta L \over L} \big)^2 \neq -2 \nu {\Delta L \over L} $

Post Undeleted by KMC
Post Deleted by KMC
Source Link
KMC
  • 217
  • 2
  • 8

Poisson relationship between area and length of electric wire

I was given the following formula to relate the change of area against the change of length of an electric wire with a Poisson ratio:

$ {\Delta A \over A} = -2 \nu {\Delta L \over L} $

where $ \Delta A \over A $ represents the change in cross-sectional area of the wire due to the transverse strain as the wire gets pulled longitudinally stretching length $ L $ to $ L+\Delta L$.

I don't get how this equation is derived. The Poisson ratio is defined by $ \nu = -{\epsilon_{lateral} \over {\epsilon_{longitudinal}} } = - {{\Delta d / d} \over {\Delta L / L}} $ where $ d $ is the diameter of the cross section. $ {\Delta A \over A} = {{0.25\pi(d+\Delta d)^2 - 0.25\pi d^2} \over {0.25\pi d^2}} $ and am just not sure where to go from here...