Timeline for How fast movement (cycles/s) can I reliably read with PSoC4 quadrature decoder?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 at 18:56 | history | migrated | from embedded.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jul 30, 2015 at 13:18 | comment | added | Mark Booth | On stack exchange it's generally better to ask more specific questions and then allow more generalised answers to flow out of them. That's how we handle duplicates. We don't close a question as a duplicate when the question duplicates another question so much as when a question has already been answered by another question. | |
| Jul 30, 2015 at 11:27 | comment | added | SF. | @MarkBooth: That would make the answer awfully specific. I'd much rather prefer one that gives the top ratings instead of one bit of data "you're within / outside the tolerances". The system can be throttled to fit within the specs, at no great loss. | |
| Jul 30, 2015 at 10:41 | comment | added | Mark Booth | Hi @SF. if that is part of your system spec, it would be good to edit into your question. I had to make far too many assumptions last night when writing my answer without this information. | |
| Jul 29, 2015 at 23:10 | comment | added | SF. | 2000 PPR at 6000RPM is already 12KHz of the signal, so the clock should be 120KHz to handle that. Still, I believe even 1MHz was available. | |
| Jul 29, 2015 at 23:08 | vote | accept | SF. | ||
| Aug 19, 2015 at 7:24 | |||||
| Jul 29, 2015 at 21:07 | history | answered | Simon Jenkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |