Timeline for When can the effect of self-weight be neglected?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2015 at 4:01 | vote | accept | M.Tarun | ||
| Jun 12, 2015 at 19:14 | answer | added | Ethan48 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 10, 2015 at 17:14 | answer | added | Antek | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 9, 2015 at 19:22 | comment | added | Gürkan Çetin | no gravity = no weight. | |
| Jun 9, 2015 at 19:11 | comment | added | joojaa | Often the calculations become complex when all the individual sources of forces are accounted for. So to not overwhelm students its often a good idea to simplify things. In fact your teacher is quite elnightened as he bothers to point out the simplifications. You react like a typical student you think this simplification detracts from accuracy. But in fact most likely your not aware that most things you have ever calculated before this is a gross simplification, because it has not been underlined. | |
| Jun 9, 2015 at 17:07 | history | edited | Chris Mueller | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Reworded question to, I think, fit better with the questioner's intention.
|
| Jun 9, 2015 at 15:07 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 9, 2015 at 15:36 | |||||
| Jun 9, 2015 at 14:31 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 9, 2015 at 14:48 | |||||
| Jun 9, 2015 at 14:31 | history | asked | M.Tarun | CC BY-SA 3.0 |