Timeline for stress/shear analysis of components
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2021 at 22:48 | comment | added | r13 | @dan For the first question, there is no stress concentration but flexural stresses depending on the support condition of the edges. For the second case, again, how the built-up section is supported. Is it part of a beam or a cantilever? Are you looking for the shear force on the connection or shear flow? You need to clarify your question to get the correct answers. | |
| Dec 4, 2018 at 15:05 | comment | added | dan | response to edit: would the contact reaction force around the hole then be a force per unit circumference? and this is the force that I would use on the cantilever beam? (and I guess that during the deformation, R would change from R1 to R2, maybe I use just R1 for a conservative approach) | |
| Dec 3, 2018 at 17:23 | history | edited | kamran | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 534 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2018 at 9:58 | comment | added | dan | sorry, after reviewing shear force a bit more I see how the equation will work in the current configuration; so I believe my approach will now be to move section by section A -> B, B -> C, calculating the shear stress for each of the different cross sectional areas. | |
| Dec 3, 2018 at 9:39 | comment | added | dan | Thanks, For the first part, I guess I am more interested in the stress concentration experienced prior to the radius reaching R_2 (I'd like to know what forces the hole can handle before failure for a given material). For the second part, I was under the impression that the equation given is for transverse shear? (i.e. the shear at line x of i.gyazo.com/0fa02ad3765777aadb6a09461294c795.png) But in my case, I guess it would be a flipped version of that with the force acting in the x direction instead, which would then not allow me to find the shear at line E as I intend? | |
| Dec 2, 2018 at 20:53 | history | answered | kamran | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
