Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 1, 2018 at 15:33 answer added gsolorzanop timeline score: 1
Jun 1, 2018 at 15:17 vote accept gsolorzanop
May 31, 2018 at 1:16 comment added Phil Sweet This is normally really simple. Piles should be on the high side of the property. Loading areas at the low side. Downhill is the easy way. Mathematically, you need an expression that captures all of your measures of merit at the very deepest level of iteration. This is the kernel expression. That's what you work with. It's has a pretty formal math history.
May 30, 2018 at 17:50 comment added paparazzo I don't follow what the variables are.
May 30, 2018 at 8:17 answer added ChP timeline score: 3
May 29, 2018 at 15:22 comment added gsolorzanop Nothing is really fixed, but there are limited alternatives I'd like to evaluate. For the geometry of the pile(s), I'm thinking of separate piles of cones, two or more linearly swept cones, incomplete rings, or a plateau shaped pile (the sloping part should be at approximately 45 degrees). The location of the unloading platform relative to the piles is what I'd like to determine from the geometries. The only real parameter I have is the volume to be stored for the next couple of years.
May 29, 2018 at 9:32 comment added ChP Are you free to determine the size, shape and location of the piles as well as the location of the unloading platforms? What parameters are fixed in this scenario?
May 29, 2018 at 8:49 answer added Fred timeline score: 1
May 28, 2018 at 16:50 review Close votes
Jun 5, 2018 at 17:21
May 28, 2018 at 16:31 history edited Wasabi CC BY-SA 4.0
added 21 characters in body
May 28, 2018 at 14:21 history asked gsolorzanop CC BY-SA 4.0