Timeline for Why is Li-Fi faster than regular wifi?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 17:05 | comment | added | Air | You can consider the frequency $\omega$ to be the rate at which crests of the waveform pass a stationary reference point. This is different from the rate at which the wavefront propagates through the medium. The wave itself, you can consider to be a disturbance in/of the electromagnetic field. These are not concepts that lend themselves very well to tangible analogies when studied in depth. | |
| Jul 1, 2016 at 22:02 | vote | accept | user3921 | ||
| Jul 1, 2016 at 21:55 | comment | added | user3921 | Hey, thank you for youre great comment. So let me just get things straight. When i read about a digital communication signal x(t) = cos(Wc*t). This "thing" travels at the speed of light regardless of Wc, So what is this Wc frequency in a physical manner? What do i do in order to transmit at Wc or at other frequency Wf? | |
| Jul 1, 2016 at 21:35 | vote | accept | user3921 | ||
| Jul 1, 2016 at 21:37 | |||||
| Jul 1, 2016 at 18:40 | history | edited | Air | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Let's not use "in a vacuum" idiomatically while discussion wave propagation speed, mmkay
|
| Jul 1, 2016 at 18:30 | history | edited | Air | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 95 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2016 at 18:24 | history | answered | Air | CC BY-SA 3.0 |